🏢 LEED v5 BD+C 评分体系 Building Design + Construction📖 学习类

To encourage a thorough, forward-looking evaluation of observed, projected, and future natural hazards so that a project can raise hazard awareness, make risks transparent, lower vulnerabilities, and secure long-term safety and durability.

鼓励对项目所在地已出现、预测及未来可能面临的自然灾害进行全面且具有前瞻性的评估，从而提升灾害认知、公开风险状况、降低脆弱性，并确保建筑长期的 safety 与耐久性。

Complete a climate and natural hazard assessment covering site-specific hazards (e.g., drought, extreme heat/cold, flooding, hurricanes, wildfire, sea level rise, tornadoes, landslides). Identify at least two priority hazards and, for each, document the IPCC emissions scenario (SSP), projected service life, hazard level, risk rating, and exposure, sensitivity, adaptive capacity, vulnerability, and overall risk. Feed the findings into planning, design, and operations; describe how strategies respond to the priority hazards. Use the USGBC template or an equivalent tool.

完成一份气候与自然灾害评估，涵盖场地特有的各类灾害（如干旱、极端冷热、洪涝、飓风、野火、海平面上升、龙卷风、滑坡等）。至少确定两项优先灾害，并对每一项记录 IPCC 排放情景（SSP）、预期使用年限、灾害等级、风险评级，以及暴露度、敏感性、适应能力、脆弱性与整体风险。将评估结果用于规划、设计与运营，并说明所采取策略如何回应优先灾害。可使用 USGBC 模板或等效工具完成。

• Start the assessment in pre-design and engage local hazard mitigation plans, FEMA/NOAA tools, and stakeholder input.
• Select an IPCC SSP scenario and define a design service life (e.g., to FY2050 or 100 years) appropriate to project risk and lifespan.
• Evaluate each hazard through exposure, sensitivity, adaptive capacity, vulnerability, and overall risk to set priorities.
• Document at least two priority hazards in the USGBC template and develop an action narrative linking them to design/operations strategies.
• Use the findings to inform resilient site and system design (e.g., elevated foundations, permeable paving) and align with relevant LEED credits.

• 在设计前期就启动评估，并参考地方减灾规划、FEMA/NOAA 工具以及利益相关方意见。
• 选择适宜的 IPCC SSP 情景，并界定设计使用年限（如至 2050 财年或 100 年），需与项目风险和使用寿命相匹配。
• 从暴露度、敏感性、适应能力、脆弱性与整体风险等维度评估每个灾害以排出优先级。
• 在 USGBC 模板中记录至少两项优先灾害，并撰写将灾害与设计/运营策略相联系的行动说明。
• 将评估结果用于指导韧性场地与系统设计（如抬高基础、透水铺装），并与相关 LEED 得分项相衔接。

To ensure development is shaped by a solid understanding of the local community's, workforce's, and supply chain's social context, and to confront potential social inequities.

确保项目开发建立在对当地社区、劳动力与供应链社会背景的深入理解之上，并直面潜在的社会不平等问题。

Complete a human impact assessment drawing on four categories as applicable: (1) Demographics (race/ethnicity, income, age, employment, vulnerable populations); (2) Local infrastructure and land use (transit, diverse uses, sustainability commitments, accessibility codes); (3) Human use and health impacts (housing affordability, social services, community safety, supply chain and construction workforce protections); (4) Occupant experience (daylight/views/operable windows, air and water quality, soundscape/lighting/wind). Use the data to inform planning, design, and operations; describe how project-specific strategies were considered. Use the USGBC template or equivalent.

完成一份人文影响评估，酌情涵盖四类内容：（1）人口统计（种族/民族、收入、年龄、就业、脆弱人群）；（2）地方基础设施与土地利用（交通、混合功能、可持续发展承诺、无障碍规范）；（3）人类使用与健康影响（住房可负担性、社会服务、社区安全、供应链与施工劳工保护）；（4）使用者体验（自然采光/视野/可开启窗、空气与水质、声/光/风环境）。将评估结果用于规划、设计与运营，并说明项目所考虑的具体策略。可使用 USGBC 模板或等效工具完成。

• Define 'community' both geographically (neighborhood to county) and functionally (occupants, workers, supply chain).
• Select at least one applicable indicator per core category and gather quantitative and qualitative findings with cited sources.
• Use public data resources (Census, CDC, EPA, FEMA) where available, complemented by community outreach and stakeholder engagement.
• Run a prioritization exercise to flag high-impact findings and link them to equity, health, and climate co-benefits.
• Develop an implementation narrative connecting assessment insights to actionable design and operations strategies.

• 从地理（邻里到郡县）与功能（使用者、劳动者、供应链）两个层面界定“社区”范围。
• 在每一核心类别中至少选择一个适用指标，收集带出处的定量与定性结果。
• 在可用情况下使用公开数据资源（人口普查、CDC、EPA、FEMA），并辅以社区外联与利益相关方参与。
• 开展优先级排序，标记高影响发现，并将其与公平、健康及气候协同效益相联系。
• 撰写实施说明，将评估洞见转化为可落地的设计与运营策略。

To understand and reduce long-term direct and indirect carbon emissions, including on-site combustion, grid-supplied electricity, refrigerants, and embodied carbon.

理解并减少长期的直接与间接碳排放，涵盖现场燃烧、电网供电、制冷剂以及隐含碳。

USGBC will generate a 25-year carbon projection for the project using data already submitted under related prerequisites: EAp1 (Operational Carbon Projection), EAp5 (Fundamental Refrigerant Management), MRp2 (Quantify and Assess Embodied Carbon), and optionally LTc4 (Transportation Demand Management). The resulting report visualizes annual and cumulative emissions per source and the percentage each contributes over 25 years. No extra data entry is required beyond those prerequisites; teams may share the report with the owner to guide reduction decisions.

USGBC 将基于其他相关先决条件已提交的数据，自动生成项目 25 年碳预测，包括：EAp1（运营碳预测）、EAp5（基础制冷剂管理）、MRp2（量化与评估隐含碳），以及可选的 LTc4（交通需求管理）。产出报告以可视化方式呈现各排放源的年度与累计排放量，以及 25 年内各来源所占比例。除这些先决条件外无需额外录入数据；团队可将报告分享给业主以指导减排决策。

• Provides a holistic, cross-category 25-year view of emissions from operations, refrigerants, embodied carbon, and (optionally) transportation.
• Pulls data automatically from EAp1, EAp5, MRp2, and LTc4 — no separate calculations required from the team.
• Helps owners compare emission sources and identify which are most significant for targeted reduction.
• The 25-year horizon balances seeing operational/renovation impacts against upfront embodied carbon while limiting long-term uncertainty.
• It is a foundational overview, not a substitute for deeper whole-building life-cycle analysis.

• 提供覆盖运营、制冷剂、隐含碳及（可选）交通的、跨类别的 25 年排放整体视图。
• 自动提取 EAp1、EAp5、MRp2、LTc4 的数据，团队无需单独计算。
• 帮助业主比较各排放源，识别最显著的源头以针对性减排。
• 25 年周期既能反映运营与翻新影响、也能对照前期隐含碳，同时控制远期不确定性。
• 它只是基础概览，不能替代更深入的全建筑生命周期分析。

To communicate and coordinate the base building's sustainable design and construction features with tenants, and to facilitate tenant LEED certification so the finished space fully addresses the rating system.

向租户传达并协调主体建筑的可持续设计与建造特征，促进租户层面的 LEED 认证，使最终完成空间能完整满足评级体系要求。

For Core and Shell projects, create tenant guidelines to be shared with all tenants before lease signing, containing: (1) a description of the base building's sustainable features and sustainability goals/objectives for tenant spaces; (2) guidance and recommendations for sustainable strategies, products, materials, and services in tenant spaces, referencing the base building's attempted LEED prerequisites and credits; (3) a named point of contact from the base building team or new owner for coordination. Distribute to every tenant prior to lease execution.

针对核心与外壳项目，编制租户指南，并在签约前分发给所有租户，内容须包括：（1）描述主体建筑的可持续特征，以及面向租户空间的可持续发展目标；（2）就租户空间中的可持续策略、产品、材料与服务给出指引，并参照主体建筑所申请的 LEED 先决条件与得分项；（3）指定一名来自主体建筑团队或新业主的对接联系人负责协调。须在租约签署前送达每位租户。

• Targets Core and Shell projects where tenants complete the interior fit-out after base building delivery.
• Describe base building sustainable features across energy, water, materials, and indoor air quality.
• Set measurable tenant-space goals (submetering, recycling, low-emitting materials) aligned with the base building's LEED efforts.
• Offer practical fit-out guidance (efficient fixtures, low-VOC materials, waste reduction) tied to pursued prerequisites/credits.
• Name a single point of contact to support tenant coordination, training, and documentation.

• 面向核心与外壳项目，即主体建筑交付后由租户完成室内装修的情形。
• 描述主体建筑在能源、水资源、材料与室内空气质量方面的可持续特征。
• 设定可衡量的租户空间目标（分项计量、回收、低逸散材料等），并与主体建筑 LEED 工作对齐。
• 提供与所申请先决条件/得分项挂钩的实用装修指引（高效器具、低 VOC 材料、减废）。
• 指定唯一对接联系人，负责支持租户协调、培训与文档工作。

To support high-performance, cost-effective, cross-functional outcomes by analyzing interrelationships among systems early, and to give teams a holistic framework for addressing decarbonization, quality of life, and ecological conservation and restoration across the rating system.

通过早期分析各系统间的相互关系，支撑高性能、高性价比、跨职能的成果，并为团队提供贯穿整个评级体系的整体框架，以同时应对脱碳、生活质量与生态保护修复。

From pre-design through early occupancy, identify and apply synergies across disciplines and systems via three initiatives: (1) Integrated team — assemble and convene an interdisciplinary team with diverse perspectives, facilitated equitably; (2) Design charette — conduct a charrette in pre-design/early design with the owner and at least four key perspectives (e.g., architect, contractor, energy modeler, community engagement); (3) LEED goal setting — define specific, measurable goals for decarbonization, quality of life, and ecological conservation/restoration, embedded in the owner's project requirements (OPR). Document the charette date, participants/roles, facilitator, and the OPR with measurable goals.

从设计前期到早期使用阶段，通过三项举措识别并应用跨学科、跨系统的协同：（1）整合团队——组建并召集具多元视角的跨学科团队，以公平方式引导；（2）设计工作坊（charette）——在设计前期/早期与业主及至少四类关键视角（如建筑师、承包商、能耗模拟师、社区参与代表）开展工作坊；（3）LEED 目标设定——界定针对脱碳、生活质量、生态保护修复的具体可衡量目标，并纳入业主项目需求（OPR）。需记录工作坊日期、参与者及角色、引导者，以及包含可衡量目标的 OPR。

• Front-load collaboration: bring owners, users, designers, engineers, contractors, and operators to the table before schematic design.
• Run a facilitated pre-design charrette with at least four distinct perspectives and produce a synergy map and meeting record.
• Set measurable goals mapped to LEED v5's three impact areas and embed them in the OPR and basis of design (BOD).
• Use an equitable facilitation approach (inclusive ground rules, rotating speaking, anonymous input) to capture all voices.
• Document outcomes (charette notes, participant list, OPR excerpts) to demonstrate the integrative loop from goal to verification.

• 前置协作：在方案设计前就让业主、使用者、设计师、工程师、承包商与运营方共同参与。
• 在设计前期举办有引导的工作坊，至少涵盖四类不同视角，并产出协同关系图与会议纪要。
• 设定与 LEED v5 三大影响领域对应的可衡量目标，并写入 OPR 与设计依据（BOD）。
• 采用公平引导方式（包容规则、轮换发言、匿名输入）以收集所有声音。
• 记录成果（工作坊纪要、参与者名单、OPR 摘录），以证明从目标到验证的整合闭环。

To ensure tenants complete the sustainable design and construction features begun by the base building, so the finished space fully addresses the rating system requirements.

确保租户延续主体建筑已开启的可持续设计与建造特征，使最终完成空间能完整满足评级体系要求。

For Core and Shell, earn 1–6 points through any combination of three options: Option 1 — develop a standard green lease establishing tenant fit-out standards and requiring compliance with key prerequisites (IPp1–IPp3, WEp2, EAp2, EAp3, EAp4, MRp1, EQp2); points scale with the number of best practices incorporated (fewer than 3 = 1 pt; 16+ = 6 pts). Option 2 — provide an executed green lease or tenant letter of attestation (1 additional point). Option 3 — earn Green Lease Leaders recognition (Silver = 1, Gold = 3, Platinum = 6 points). Commit to incorporating the green lease in future tenant leases.

针对核心与外壳项目，可通过三种选项任意组合获得 1–6 分：选项 1——制定标准绿色租约，确立租户装修标准，并要求符合关键先决条件（IPp1–IPp3、WEp2、EAp2、EAp3、EAp4、MRp1、EQp2）；分值随纳入的最佳实践数量递增（少于 3 项=1 分；16 项及以上=6 分）。选项 2——提供已签署的绿色租约或租户承诺函（额外 1 分）。选项 3——获得 Green Lease Leaders 认证（银级=1 分、金级=3 分、白金级=6 分）。须承诺在 future 租约中纳入绿色租约。

• A green lease bridges the owner–tenant 'split incentive' by aligning costs and benefits of efficiency investments.
• Tenant fit-outs must at minimum comply with the listed LEED prerequisites across IP, Water, Energy, Materials, and EQ.
• Best practices that earn points include tenant-paid utilities, cost-recovery clauses, energy/water disclosure, submetering, and IAQ/comfort practices.
• Executing an actual green lease (Option 2) or joining Green Lease Leaders (Option 3) can add points beyond Option 1.
• Commit to using the standard green lease in all future tenant leases to support ongoing certification and ESG goals.

• 绿色租约通过统一能效投资的成本与收益，化解业主与租户之间的“激励错位”问题。
• 租户装修至少须符合所列 LEED 先决条件，覆盖 IP、水资源、能源、材料与 EQ 等领域。
• 可获分的最佳实践包括租户自付水电费、成本回收条款、能源/水披露、分项计量，以及室内空气与舒适度措施。
• 实际签署绿色租约（选项 2）或加入 Green Lease Leaders（选项 3）可在选项 1 之外再加分。
• 承诺在今后所有租约中采用标准绿色租约，以支撑持续认证与 ESG 目标。

Build community resilience by keeping development off environmentally sensitive lands that deliver critical ecosystem services, and reduce the harm a building's location can cause to the surrounding site.

通过避免在提供关键生态系统服务的环境敏感土地上开发来增强社区韧性，并降低建筑选址对场地周边环境造成的负面影响。

Earn 1 point by meeting either Option 1 — place the development footprint on previously developed land — or Option 2 — locate on undeveloped land that avoids defined sensitive-land types. Sensitive lands include prime/unique/important farmland, regulated floodplains (or the 100-year floodplain where no map exists), habitats of threatened/endangered or NatureServe-listed imperiled species, water bodies within 100 ft (30 m), wetlands within 50 ft (15 m), and steep unstable slopes where 40% (15-25% slopes) or 60% (>25% slopes) must be protected from all activity.

满足以下任一路径得 1 分：路径一，将开发用地置于已开发土地之上；或路径二，在尚未开发的土地上选址但须避开指定的敏感土地类型。敏感土地包括优质/特殊/地方性农田、法定洪泛区（无图时指百年一遇洪泛区）、受威胁/濒危或 NatureServe 列为濒危的物种栖息地、距水体 100 英尺（30 米）内、距湿地 50 英尺（15 米）内，以及不稳定陡坡（15%–25% 坡度须保护 40%，大于 25% 坡度须保护 60%）。

• The credit is the sole LT credit aligned only with Ecological Conservation and Restoration.
• Two mutually exclusive pathways: previously developed sites, or undeveloped sites that avoid sensitive lands.
• Sensitive-land buffers protect water bodies (100 ft) and wetlands (50 ft), with minor improvements allowed only if they do not alter vegetation or hydrology.
• Steep-slope protection is tiered by grade and instability, requiring 40% or 60% of slope area left undeveloped.
• International projects may use IUCN Red List, Global Wetlands Map, and the World Database on Protected Areas as equivalents.
• Documentation centers on site maps, a narrative of verification, and area calculations of avoided sensitive land.

• 该得分点唯一仅对应“生态保护与修复”影响领域的 LT 得分点。
• 两条互斥路径：已开发场地，或避开敏感土地的未开发场地。
• 对水体（100 英尺）和湿地（50 英尺）设缓冲保护，仅在不改变植被与水文的小型改良时才允许例外。
• 陡坡保护按坡度和稳定性分级，须将 40% 或 60% 的坡地留作不开发区域。
• 国际项目可使用 IUCN 红色名录、全球湿地图和世界保护区数据库作为等效依据。
• 证明文件以场地图纸、验证说明及避免开发的敏感土地面积计算为核心。

Support the economic and social vitality of communities by enabling people to live and work in close proximity, directing investment to challenged areas, and advancing the ecology, culture, and health of the surrounding neighborhood.

通过让居民就近生活与工作、将投资引向发展受限地区、并提升周边社区的生态、文化与健康，来支持社区的经济与社会活力。

Earn 1-2 points through one or more options. Option 1 (Priority Sites): remediate a brownfield (2 pts) or locate in a locally designated historic district (1 pt). Option 2 (Housing and Jobs Proximity): hire 15% of construction labor from the local district (1 pt), or provide location-efficient affordable housing (≥10% of residential floor area at 60%/80% AMI, 15-year affordability, plus transit/walkable or jobs-to-housing compliance) (2 pts). Option 3 (Equitable Construction): workforce training via registered apprenticeship (15% hours) or monthly life-skills courses (2 pts). Schools may use Option 4 (shared public spaces or community partnership, 1 pt each). Data centers/warehouses use Option 5 (meet 1-3 plus sit ≥300 ft from sensitive receptors, 1 pt).

通过以下一个或多个选项获得 1–2 分。选项一（优先场地）：修复棕地（2 分）或位于地方指定的历史街区（1 分）。选项二（住房与就业邻近）：本地行政区雇佣 15% 施工劳动力（1 分），或提供区位高效的可负担住房（住宅建筑面积至少 10% 按 60%/80% 地区收入中位数定价并维持 15 年，且满足公交/步行或可负担就业比要求）（2 分）。选项三（公平建设）：通过注册学徒制（15% 工时）或月度生活技能培训提供劳工培训（2 分）。学校可用选项四（共享公共空间或社区合作，各 1 分）。数据中心/仓储用选项五（满足选项 1–3 且距敏感受体≥300 英尺，1 分）。

• This is the LT credit most focused on social equity and community health.
• Brownfield remediation earns the top 2 points and can use ~78% less land than greenfield development.
• Affordable-housing path ties directly to LTc3 (transit or walkable location) and a jobs-to-housing ratio above 1.2:1 within 0.5 miles.
• Workforce training may be job-skills (registered apprenticeship) or life-skills (monthly on-site courses).
• Schools share unused spaces with the public; data centers/warehouses must buffer sensitive receptors by 300 ft.
• Construction jobs are counted as full-time equivalents; only project-generated jobs within the administrative district qualify.

• 这是 LT 类别中最侧重社会公平与社区健康的得分点。
• 棕地修复可获最高 2 分，且比绿地开发少用约 78% 的土地。
• 可负担住房路径直接关联 LTc3（公交或步行区位），并要求在 0.5 英里内就业/住房比超过 1.2:1。
• 劳工培训可为职业技能（注册学徒）或生活技能（月度现场课程）。
• 学校向公众共享闲置空间；数据中心/仓储须与敏感受体保持 300 英尺缓冲。
• 施工岗位以全职等效人数计算，仅项目在行政区内直接创造的岗位可计入。

Conserve land and ecosystem resources by developing where infrastructure already exists, and promote livability, walkability, and transportation efficiency while cutting vehicle distance traveled and its emissions.

通过在已有基础设施之处开发来保护土地与生态资源，并提升宜居性、步行可达性与交通效率，同时减少车辆出行里程及其排放。

Earn 1-6 points from several options. Option 1 (Surrounding Density): meet existing density thresholds within 0.25 mi (1-2 pts). Option 2 (Access to Transit): public transit within 0.25-0.5 mi meeting frequency tables (1-4 pts), or project-sponsored shuttle for ≥3 years (1-2 pts). Option 3 (Walkable Location): Walk Score ≥60 or sufficient nearby uses within 0.5 mi (1-3 pts). Schools may use Option 4 (Connected Site, adjacent/infill previously developed, 1-2 pts) and Option 5 (Pedestrian Access to school, 1-2 pts). Data centers/warehouses may use Option 6 (prior developed/adjacent industrial-commercial, or freight/transit resources, 1-2 pts). Options may be combined.

从多个选项中获得 1–6 分。选项一（周边密度）：在 0.25 英里内达到既有密度门槛（1–2 分）。选项二（公交可达）：0.25–0.5 英里内有公交并满足班次要求（1–4 分），或项目自办班车并承诺≥3 年（1–2 分）。选项三（步行区位）：Walk Score ≥60 或 0.5 英里内有足量周边用途（1–3 分）。学校可用选项四（连接场地，相邻/填充式已开发，1–2 分）和五（至学校的步行可达，1–2 分）。数据中心/仓储可用选项六（既有已开发/相邻工商业，或货运/交通资源，1–2 分）。各选项可叠加。

• The highest-value LT credit (up to 6 points) and the only one touching all three impact areas.
• Density is measured by combined (sq ft/acre) or separate residential (DU/acre) and nonresidential (FAR) methods within 0.25 mi.
• Transit points scale with weekday/weekend trip minimums (e.g., 72/30 trips = 1 pt up to 360/216 = 4 pts).
• Walk Score must be 'supported' (verified data); proximity path needs uses spanning at least 3 of 5 categories within 0.5 mi.
• Connected/adjacent site options reuse existing infrastructure by bordering previously developed parcels (25% adjacent, 75% infill).
• Data centers/warehouses are steered to industrial-commercial adjacency and logistics/freight rail resources.

• 分值最高的 LT 得分点（最高 6 分），也是唯一同时涉及三大影响领域的得分点。
• 密度以综合（平方英尺/英亩）或分别按住宅（户/英亩）与非住宅（容积率）在 0.25 英里内计算。
• 公交得分随工作日/周末班次下限递增（如 72/30 班次为 1 分，至 360/216 班次为 4 分）。
• Walk Score 须为“已验证”数据；周边用途路径要求在 0.5 英里内覆盖 5 类用途中的至少 3 类。
• 连接/相邻场地选项通过毗邻已开发地块（相邻 25%、填充 75%）来复用既有基础设施。
• 数据中心/仓储被引导至工商业相邻地块及物流枢纽/货运铁路资源。

Reduce pollution and land-consumption impacts of automobile use by encouraging alternative transportation networks, and foster more livable, healthy communities through lower vehicle miles traveled and emissions.

通过鼓励替代性交通网络来减少汽车使用带来的污染与土地消耗影响，并以更低的车辆出行里程和排放营造更宜居、健康的社区。

First complete a Transportation Demand Management Assessment (estimate annual VMT, baseline and proposed carbon emissions, and reduction), unless exempt (government-mandated TDM program, or infill affordable housing / transit-priority projects). Then earn up to 4 points: Option 1 (Parking) — reduce capacity 30/60/100% below ITE base ratios (1-3 pts) or charge market-rate parking fees (2 pts); Option 2 (Active Travel Facilities) — bicycle network + storage (1 pt), shower/changing facilities for 1% of occupants (1 pt), and/or secure bicycle maintenance station (1 pt).

首先完成交通需求管理评估（估算年度车辆里程、基准与拟议碳排放及减排量），符合豁免条件者除外（政府强制 TDM 计划，或填充式可负担住房/公交优先区项目）。随后最多获 4 分：选项一（停车）——将容量较 ITE 基准降低 30%/60%/100%（1–3 分）或收取不低于市场价的停车费（2 分）；选项二（主动出行设施）——自行车网络与存放（1 分）、供 1% 使用者的淋浴更衣设施（1 分）、和/或固定安全的自行车维修站（1 分）。

• Requires a VMT/carbon Transportation Demand Management Assessment unless exempt; supports the IPp3 Carbon Assessment.
• Parking reduction points increased from 1 (v4.1) to 3 in LEED v5, reflecting strong land- and emission-saving value.
• Bicycle storage is split into short-term (within 600 ft) and long-term (within 300 ft), with shared micromobility counting up to 50%.
• Active travel supports walking, biking, e-bikes, and scooters to cut congestion and parking demand.
• Baseline parking ratios come from the ITE Parking Generation Manual, 6th edition; on-street public parking is excluded.
• Unbundling parking (separate from rent/lease) is highlighted as a behavioral TDM strategy.

• 须完成车辆里程/碳排的交通需求管理评估，除非豁免；该评估支撑 IPp3 碳评估。
• 停车削减分值从 v4.1 的 1 分提升至 LEED v5 的 3 分，凸显其节约土地与减排价值。
• 自行车存放分短期（600 英尺内）与长期（300 英尺内），共享微出行设施最多可折算 50%。
• 主动出行支持步行、骑行、电动自行车与滑板车，以缓解拥堵并减少停车需求。
• 基准停车比例取自 ITE《停车生成手册》第 6 版；街道公共停车不计入。
• 将停车费与租约“解绑”作为一种行为型 TDM 策略被重点提及。

Encourage adoption of EVs and charging infrastructure, and help reduce the negative community health effects of greenhouse gases and pollutants from conventionally fueled vehicles.

鼓励采用电动汽车及充电基础设施，并有助于减轻传统燃油车排放的温室气体与污染物对社区健康的负面影响。

Earn up to 2 points by combining options. Option 1 (EV Supply Equipment): install Level 2/3 EVSE at 5%/10% of commercial or 10%/15% of residential parking (1-2 pts), meeting ENERGY STAR connected-functionality and time-of-use response, with at least one accessible charging space. Option 2 (EV Readiness): pre-install 208-240V, 40-amp circuit with conduit to 10% commercial or 20% residential spaces (1 pt). Spaces with installed EVSE cannot also count as EV-ready. Projects without owned/leased parking are ineligible.

通过组合选项最多获 2 分。选项一（充电设备）：在商业 5%/10% 或住宅 10%/15% 的停车位安装 2/3 级充电设备（1–2 分），满足 ENERGY STAR 联网功能与分时响应要求，且至少一处为无障碍充电位。选项二（充电预留）：为商业 10% 或住宅 20% 的停车位预装 208–240 伏、40 安培并带线管的电路（1 分）。已安装充电设备的车位不可再计为预留位。无自有或租赁停车位的项目不符合资格。

• The only LT credit aligned solely with Decarbonization, targeting transport electrification.
• Option 1 rewards installed EVSE; thresholds differ for commercial (5%/10%) versus residential (10%/15%) parking.
• All EVSE must meet ENERGY STAR connected-functionality (network, security, open protocols, remote, payment, data) and respond to time-of-use price signals.
• Option 2 (EV Readiness) lets projects pre-wire spaces during construction, avoiding future trenching and panel upgrades.
• At least one EV charging station must be in an accessible space (≥8 ft wide, 5 ft access aisle) for users with disabilities.
• Combining Options 1 and 2 yields 2 points only as 1+1; spaces cannot be double-counted.

• 唯一仅对应“脱碳”的 LT 得分点，聚焦交通电气化。
• 选项一奖励已安装的充电设备；商业（5%/10%）与住宅（10%/15%）门槛不同。
• 所有充电设备须满足 ENERGY STAR 联网功能（网络、安全、开放协议、远程、支付、数据）并能响应分时电价信号。
• 选项二（充电预留）允许在建设期预布线，避免日后开挖与更换电箱。
• 至少一处充电站须设于无障碍车位（宽≥8 英尺、5 英尺通行带）以服务残障使用者。
• 组合选项一与二仅按 1+1 得 2 分，车位不可重复计算。

To limit construction-related disturbance to the site and to preserve existing native vegetation, healthy soils, and wildlife habitats from damage during building work.

限制施工活动对场地的扰动，并在建设过程中保护场地内既有的原生植被、健康土壤与野生动物栖息地免受破坏。

Required for all projects. Demonstrate compliance through two linked components: (1) an Erosion and Sedimentation Control (ESC) plan that follows the U.S. EPA 2022 Construction General Permit (CGP), the EU Taxonomy DNSH Pollution Prevention criteria, or a locally equivalent and equally stringent standard, including exclusion zones for critical habitats and regular inspections; AND (2) a preconstruction site assessment identifying special-status vegetation (100% of which must be conserved), healthy plant communities (protected by physical exclusion zones), and invasive species (to be removed and not replanted). Only native or adapted, non-invasive vegetation may be installed.

所有项目必须达标。需通过两项关联内容证明合规：(1) 水土流失控制（ESC）计划，遵循美国 EPA 2022 施工通用许可（CGP）、欧盟分类法 DNSH 污染防治要求或同等更严格的本地标准，包括为关键栖息地设置隔离区并定期巡查；以及 (2) 施工前场地评估，识别特殊状态植被（须 100% 保留）、健康植物群落（以物理隔离区保护）和入侵物种（须清除且不得再种植）。仅可种植原生或适应性、非入侵性的植被。

• Applies to every site regardless of size, even plots under one acre; zero lot line sites may submit a narrative instead.
• ESC plan must conform to CGP, EU Taxonomy DNSH, or a local equivalent and include habitat exclusion zones plus inspections every 7 days or after 0.25 in. storms.
• Special-status vegetation defined by local, state, or federal entities must be conserved at 100%.
• Healthy habitats require physical exclusion zones; invasive species must be identified, removed, and never replanted.
• All planted vegetation must be native or adapted to the EPA Level III ecoregion and not currently listed as invasive.

• 适用于所有规模的场地，包括不足一英亩的地块；零退线项目可提交说明替代。
• 水土流失控制计划须符合 CGP、欧盟分类法 DNSH 或本地等效标准，并包含栖息地隔离区，每 7 天或 0.25 英寸降雨后巡查。
• 由地方、州或联邦定义的特殊状态植被必须 100% 保留。
• 健康栖息地须设物理隔离区；入侵物种须识别、清除且不得再种植。
• 所有种植植被须为原生或适应该地 EPA 三级生态区的非入侵物种。

To conserve existing natural areas, enhance biodiversity, rehabilitate degraded land, and provide healthy, functioning habitats for local wildlife.

保护既有自然区域、提升生物多样性、修复退化土地，并为本地野生动物提供健康且能自我维持的栖息地。

Choose Option 1 (1–2 points): preserve and restore habitat. On greenfield sites, protect at least 40% of greenfield area from all development. On previously disturbed sites, restore 20% (1 point) or 40% (2 points) of disturbed area, with soil restoration (no prime-farmland or peat soils) and vegetation restoration (at least 10 native/adapted species spanning 2 of trees/shrubs/ground cover, plus at least 110 sq ft of native pollinator planting with signage). AND/OR Option 2 (1 point): bird-friendly glass with a maximum American Bird Conservancy Threat Factor of 30 on all glazing up to 50 ft above grade, 20 ft above a green roof, or any height on guardrails and windshields.

可选方案一（1–2 分）：保护与修复栖息地。绿地项目须将至少 40% 的绿地面积排除于一切开发之外。已扰动场地须修复 20%（1 分）或 40%（2 分）的扰动区域，并进行土壤修复（禁用优质农田土或泥炭土）和植被修复（至少 10 种原生/适应性物种，覆盖乔木、灌木、地被中的两类，另设至少 110 平方英尺原生传粉植物区并设标识）。和/或方案二（1 分）：采用鸟类友好玻璃，所有玻璃在地面以上 50 英尺、绿化屋顶以上 20 英尺或护栏/挡风玻璃任意高度处，其美国鸟类保护协会威胁因子（Threat Factor）最高不超过 30。

• Greenfield projects preserve 40% of undisturbed area; previously disturbed sites restore 20–40% for 1–2 points.
• Soil restoration bars imported prime-farmland soils and sphagnum peat; restoration uses on-site or comparable soils.
• Vegetation must include 10+ native/adapted species, at least two plant layers, and a dedicated pollinator patch with educational signage.
• Bird-friendly glass uses the ABC Threat Factor Database; a TF of 30 or below cuts collisions by roughly 50%.
• Options can be combined (habitat + bird glass) to reach the maximum 2 points.

• 绿地项目须保留 40% 未开发区域；已扰动场地修复 20%–40% 可获 1–2 分。
• 土壤修复禁止使用外购优质农田土与泥炭土，须使用场地内或功能相当的土壤。
• 植被须含 10 种以上原生/适应性物种、至少两个植物层次，并设专门的传粉植物区与教育标识。
• 鸟类友好玻璃采用 ABC 威胁因子数据库，TF 不超过 30 可减少约 50% 撞击。
• 两项方案可叠加（栖息地 + 鸟类玻璃）以获取最高 2 分。

To create outdoor open space that encourages engagement with the environment, supports social and physical activity and passive recreation, and incorporates elements that honor the served community.

营造能促进人与环境互动、支持社交与体育活动及休憩的户外开放空间，并融入体现所在社区特色的元素。

Earn 1 point by meeting three linked parts: (1) Sufficient Outdoor Space Area — barrier-free, physically accessible space covering at least 30% of total site area (including building footprint), with at least 25% vegetated using two or more vegetation types or an overhead canopy; (2) Urban Outdoor Space — include at least one of biophilic space, garden, recreational area, or social area (e.g., seating for 5% of occupants); AND (3) Community Outdoor Space — include at least one of publicly accessible space, cultural expression (2+ local-art installations), or acoustic features if within 400 m of a major noise source.

满足三部分即可获 1 分：(1) 充足的户外空间面积——无障碍、物理可达的空间至少占场地总面积（含建筑占地）的 30%，其中至少 25% 为植被，含两类以上植物或上层植被冠层；(2) 城市户外空间——至少包含亲自然空间、花园、休闲区或社交区之一（如可容纳 5% 使用者的座椅）；以及 (3) 社区户外空间——至少包含公共开放、文化表达（2 件以上本地艺术装置）或邻近重大噪声源 400 米内的声景优化之一。

• Outdoor space must be barrier-free and reach 30% of total site area, with 25% vegetated or shaded by canopy.
• Urban element options include biophilic space, community garden, recreational area, or social seating area.
• Community element may be public daytime access, local-art installations, or positive soundscapes near noise sources.
• Turf counts toward total open space but not toward the 25% vegetated requirement.
• Accessible vegetated roofs and roof paving can contribute; security-restricted facilities are exempt from public access.

• 户外空间须无障碍，并达到场地总面积的 30%，其中 25% 为植被或由冠层遮荫。
• 城市元素可选项包括亲自然空间、社区花园、休闲区或社交座椅区。
• 社区元素可为日间公共开放、本地艺术装置，或邻近噪声源的声景优化。
• 草坪可计入总开放空间，但不计入 25% 植被要求。
• 可达的绿化屋顶与屋顶铺装可计入；因安全受限的设施可豁免公共开放要求。

To cut runoff volume and improve water quality by mimicking the site's natural hydrology and water balance, so the project does not worsen flooding in downstream frontline communities.

通过模拟场地的自然水文与水均衡来减少径流总量并改善水质，使项目不致加剧下游脆弱社区的洪涝问题。

Option 1 (1–3 points): retain on-site the runoff from a given percentile of regional/local rainfall events using low-impact development (LID) and green infrastructure (GI). Thresholds: 80th/70th percentile = 1 point, 85th/75th = 2 points, 90th/80th = 3 points (lower bar for zero lot line). An extra point is available when a portion of that retained volume is collected and reused for irrigation, flush fixtures, cooling-tower/boiler makeup, or process water. Option 2 (3 points): calculate the added runoff from the proposed design versus natural land-cover conditions and retain that increase on-site. Zero lot line projects may combine on- and off-site strategies.

方案一（1–3 分）：采用低影响开发（LID）和绿色基础设施（GI）在场地内滞留特定百分位降雨事件的径流。阈值：80/70 百分位 = 1 分，85/75 = 2 分，90/80 = 3 分（零退线项目阈值更低）。若将部分滞留水量收集回用于灌溉、冲厕、冷却塔/锅炉补水或工艺用水，可额外加 1 分。方案二（3 分）：计算拟建设计相对自然地表覆盖所增加的径流量，并在场地内滞留该增量。零退线项目可结合场地内外策略。

• Option 1 uses historical 30-year rainfall data and percentile events retained via LID/GI practices.
• Rainwater harvesting for reuse earns a bonus point and may also support Water Efficiency credits.
• Runoff volume is computed with modified rational method, TR-55, SWMM, or similar.
• Option 2 requires matching natural land-cover runoff and retaining the design-caused increase (3 points).
• GI/LID measures include rain gardens, green roofs, permeable pavement, swales, cisterns, and exfiltration trenches.

• 方案一基于 30 年历史降雨数据，通过 LID/GI 滞留特定百分位降雨事件。
• 雨水收集回用可获加分，并可能同时支持节水类别得分。
• 径流量可采用修正理性法、TR-55、SWMM 等方法计算。
• 方案二要求匹配自然地表的径流并滞留设计带来的增量（3 分）。
• GI/LID 措施包括雨水花园、绿化屋顶、透水铺装、植草沟、蓄水池及渗滤沟等。

To lower the risk of catastrophic impacts from natural and climate-driven hazards on the site and neighboring landscapes by designing, building, and maintaining spaces that withstand observed, projected, and future threats.

通过设计、建造和维护能够抵御已发生、预期及未来气候与自然灾害的场地，降低灾害对项目及周边区域造成灾难性影响的风险。

Earn 2 points by designing and constructing the site for at least two of the highest-priority hazards identified in IPp1: Climate Resilience Assessment. Hazards and exemplar strategies: Drought (comply with WEc2 and plant native/drought-tolerant species); Extreme heat (two or more of shaded spaces, evaporative cooling, passive solar orientation, cooling stations, proximity to a cooling station, pavement SR ≥ 0.33, or open-grid pavement); Flooding (two or more per ASCE 24/FEMA 543, e.g., critical utilities above design flood elevation, flood-resistant materials, or certification); Hail (FORTIFIED Commercial Hail); Hurricanes/high winds (FORTIFIED Wind, backup power, windbreaks); Sea level rise (two or more adaptive measures); Tsunamis (Designing for Tsunamis + TsunamiReady signage/radio); Wildfires (SITES v2 C4.11, NWCG, Firewise); Winter storms (two or more strategies).

通过针对 IPp1 气候韧性评估确定的至少两类最高优先级灾害进行场地设计建造，可获 2 分。各类灾害及示例策略：干旱（符合 WEc2 并种植原生/耐旱物种）；极端高温（遮阳空间、蒸发降温、被动式朝向、降温站、临近降温站、铺装 SR ≥ 0.33 或开孔铺装中任选两项）；洪涝（依 ASCE 24/FEMA 543 采取两项以上，如关键设施高于设计洪水位、防洪材料或认证）；冰雹（FORTIFIED 商业冰雹标准）；飓风/强风（FORTIFIED 风灾标准、备用电源、防风林）；海平面上升（两项以上适应措施）；海啸（海啸设计指南 + TsunamiReady 标识/广播）；野火（SITES v2 C4.11、NWCG、Firewise）；冬季风暴（两项以上策略）。

• Credit is built on the hazard priorities established by the IPp1 Climate Resilience Assessment.
• At least two hazard types must be addressed to earn the full 2 points; more are encouraged.
• Extreme heat options include shading, evaporative cooling, high-SR paving (≥0.33), and emergency cooling stations.
• Flooding requires critical utilities above the design flood elevation plus freeboard, flood-resistant materials, or certification.
• References widely used standards: FORTIFIED, ASCE 24, FEMA 543, ASCE/SEI 7, and SITES v2.

• 该得分建立在 IPp1 气候韧性评估所确定的灾害优先级之上。
• 须应对至少两类灾害方可获满分 2 分，鼓励应对更多类别。
• 极端高温选项包括遮荫、蒸发降温、高太阳反射率铺装（≥0.33）及应急降温站。
• 洪涝要求关键设施高于设计洪水位并留余幅，或采用防洪材料，或通过认证。
• 引用多项通用标准：FORTIFIED、ASCE 24、FEMA 543、ASCE/SEI 7 及 SITES v2。

To lessen the unequal burdens that heat islands and extreme heat events impose on local microclimates and habitats.

减轻热岛与极端高温事件对局部小气候及栖息地造成的不均衡影响。

Choose from three options, each worth 1 point and combinable up to 2 points. Option 1 (Nonroof and Roof): meet a weighted average where nonroof measures count 0.5 and high-reflectance or vegetated roofs count 0.75; nonroof paving needs initial SR ≥ 0.33 and roofs need minimum SRI (low-slope 82 initial/64 aged, steep 39 initial/32 aged). Option 2 (Parking Under Cover): place 100% of project parking under cover with compliant shading (aged SRI ≥ 32 or initial ≥ 39, vegetated, or energy-generating). Option 3 (Tree Equity): for U.S. sites in 'high' or 'highest priority' Tree Equity Score areas, increase on-site canopy; international or unscored U.S. sites use IPp2 to boost canopy for underserved neighboring communities.

三项方案各值 1 分，可叠加至最高 2 分。方案一（非屋顶与屋顶）：采用加权平均，非屋顶措施计 0.5，高反射或绿化屋顶计 0.75；非屋顶铺装初始 SR ≥ 0.33，屋顶须满足最低 SRI（缓坡 82 初始/64 老化，陡坡 39 初始/32 老化）。方案二（车位遮盖）：100% 项目车位置于遮盖下，遮盖物须合规（老化 SRI ≥ 32 或初始 ≥ 39、绿化或发电设施）。方案三（树木公平）：美国位于“高”或“最高优先”树木公平评分区的场地须增加场地内冠层；国际或无评分的美国场地依 IPp2 为服务不足的邻近社区增加冠层。

• Three independent 1-point options; pursuing two yields the maximum 2 points.
• Option 1 balances nonroof strategies (shade, high-SR paving, open-grid) against roof reflectance or vegetation.
• Option 2 requires all owned/leased off-street parking to be fully covered or underground.
• Option 3 targets tree-canopy inequity, using American Forests Tree Equity Score or IPp2 for international sites.
• Increasing landscaped area is noted as the most effective overall heat-island strategy.

• 三个相互独立的 1 分方案，采取两项即达最高 2 分。
• 方案一将非屋顶策略（遮荫、高 SR 铺装、开孔铺装）与屋顶反射率或绿化相平衡。
• 方案二要求项目自有/租赁的所有路外车位完全遮盖或置于地下。
• 方案三针对树木冠层不公平，美国用 American Forests 树木公平评分，国际用 IPp2。
• 增加绿化面积被视为最有效的整体热岛缓解策略。

To improve access to the night sky, enhance nighttime visibility, and reduce the harmful effects of development on wildlife and people caused by artificial light.

改善夜空可见度、提升夜间可视性，并减少人工照明开发对野生动物与人类造成的不良影响。

Earn 1 point by meeting three linked criteria for exterior luminaires inside the project boundary, based on the IES/IDA Model Lighting Ordinance (MLO) lighting zone: (1) Uplight — ratings must not exceed U0 in LZ0/LZ1 and U2/U3/U4 in LZ2/LZ3/LZ4; (2) Light Trespass — backlight and glare ratings per IES TM-15-11 based on luminaire mounting height and distance to the lighting boundary; AND (3) Internally Illuminated Exterior Signage — maximum nighttime luminance of 50 cd/m2 (LZ0–1), 100 (LZ2), 200 (LZ3), or 350 (LZ4). Certain fixtures (transportation signals, theatrical, hospital ED/helipad, flag, exempt signage) are excluded if controlled separately.

基于 IES/IDA 模型照明条例（MLO）光照分区，对项目边界内外部灯具满足三项关联标准即可获 1 分：(1) 上射光——LZ0/LZ1 不超过 U0，LZ2/LZ3/LZ4 分别不超过 U2/U3/U4；(2) 光侵入——依据 IES TM-15-11，按灯具安装高度与至照明边界的距离限定背射光与眩光等级；以及 (3) 内部发光外部标识——夜间最大亮度 LZ0–1 为 50、LZ2 为 100、LZ3 为 200、LZ4 为 350 cd/m2。部分灯具（交通信号、剧场、医院急诊/停机坪、国旗、豁免标识）若独立控制可豁免。

• Uses MLO lighting zones to set uplight, backlight, and glare limits for all exterior luminaires.
• Uplight rating U0 (zero upward light) is mandatory in the darkest zones LZ0 and LZ1.
• Light trespass strictness increases as fixtures get closer to the lighting boundary.
• Exterior signage luminance caps scale from 50 to 350 cd/m2 by lighting zone.
• Exempt fixtures (transportation, theatrical, healthcare, flag) must be controlled separately from other lighting.

• 采用 MLO 光照分区为所有外部灯具设定上射光、背射光与眩光限值。
• 最暗分区 LZ0 与 LZ1 强制要求上射光等级 U0（零向上溢光）。
• 灯具越靠近照明边界，光侵入要求越严格。
• 外部标识亮度上限按光照分区从 50 增至 350 cd/m2。
• 豁免灯具（交通、剧场、医疗、国旗）须与其他照明分开控制。

To protect potable water supplies and strengthen water management by tracking total consumption, so that projects can spot inefficiencies and find further savings.

通过追踪总用水量来保护饮用水资源并加强用水管理，使项目能够识别低效环节并发现进一步节水的机会。

Install or use existing permanent meters to monitor, record, and report total potable and alternative water use for the building and grounds. The facility manager/tenants must be able to access meter data; alternative sources must be metered separately from municipal potable water; and the owner must commit to sharing whole-project usage data with USGBC at least annually for five years (or until ownership/lessee change). Meters are only needed for systems within the scope of work.

安装或使用现有永久水表，监测、记录并报告建筑及附属场地的总饮用水与替代水源用量。设施管理者/租户必须能够访问计量数据；替代水源须与市政饮用水分开计量；业主须承诺至少每年向 USGBC 共享整项目用水数据，持续五年（或在所有权/租户变更前）。仅在工程范围内的系统需安装水表。

• Requires whole-project metering of every water source (potable and alternative) in gallons or liters, with data accessible to facility managers and tenants.
• Alternative water sources must be metered separately from municipally supplied potable water.
• Owners commit to reporting whole-project data to USGBC annually for five years using an approved template or third-party source such as ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager.
• Excludes future tenant utility services and submeters outside the new-construction scope of work.
• Campus projects report only usage within their own project boundary, using engineering calculations or prorated campus data for irrigation.

• 要求以加仑或升为单位对工程范围内所有水源（饮用与替代）进行整项目计量，且设施管理者与租户可访问数据。
• 替代水源须与市政饮用水分开单独计量。
• 业主承诺使用 USGBC 认可模板或第三方来源（如 ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager）每年向 USGBC 上报整项目数据，持续五年。
• 不包含未来租户公用设施服务及不属于新建工程范围的子表。
• 园区项目仅报告自身边界内用量，灌溉可采用工程计算或按园区总表分摊数据。

To lower potable water consumption and the energy and carbon tied to treating and distributing that water, preserving resources through an efficiency-first approach.

降低饮用水消耗以及与之相关的处理与输送能源和碳排放，以效率优先的方式保护水资源。

Meet three minimum thresholds together: (1) Fixture & Fittings efficiency via Option 1 prescriptive max flush/flow rates (e.g., toilets 1.28 gpf, private faucets 1.5 gpm) OR Option 2 performance path showing 20% aggregate reduction from baseline; (2) Minimum Equipment efficiency for appliances/kitchen/process water per Tables 3-4 (e.g., ENERGY STAR appliances, no once-through cooling); and (3) Outdoor efficiency via Option 1 No Irrigation (beyond a 2-year establishment period) OR Option 2 Efficient Irrigation cutting TIR by at least 30%.

同时满足三项最低门槛：（1）器具与配件效率——路径一为规定性最大冲/流量（如坐便器 1.28 gpf、家用龙头 1.5 gpm），或路径二为性能法在基准上再降 20%；（2）设备最低效率——依据表 3-4 的 appliances/厨房/工艺用水标准（如 ENERGY STAR 器具、禁止直流冷却）；（3）室外用水效率——路径一无灌溉（仅限两年栽植期）或路径二高效灌溉使 TIR 降低至少 30%。

• Three components must all be met: fixtures/fittings, equipment/process water, and outdoor water use.
• Fixtures may comply via prescriptive max rates or a 20% calculated reduction from the baseline using a USGBC-approved calculator.
• New appliances and equipment (not existing ones) must meet efficiency tables; ENERGY STAR or performance equivalents are required, plus no once-through potable cooling.
• Outdoor compliance is either no permanent irrigation or a 30% TIR reduction through plant selection and irrigation efficiency.
• Core & Shell projects apply only to base-building scope and must include manufacturer documentation in Tenant Guidelines (IPp4).

• 须同时满足三部分：器具配件、设备/工艺用水、室外用水。
• 器具可选择规定性最大速率，或使用 USGBC 认可计算器在基准上计算降低 20%。
• 新装设备（既有设备除外）须达效率表要求；须采用 ENERGY STAR 或等效性能，且禁止饮用水直流冷却。
• 室外合规方式为无永久灌溉，或通过植物选择与灌溉效率使 TIR 降低 30%。
• Core & Shell 项目仅适用于主体建筑范围，并须在租户指南（IPp4）中包含厂家资料。

To conserve potable water, support water management, limit material waste caused by leak damage, and uncover further savings by tracking consumption at the subsystem level.

通过子系统级用水追踪来保护饮用水、支持用水管理、减少漏损造成的材料浪费，并发现更多节水机会。

Choose one of two paths for 1 point. Option 1 Submeters: install permanent meters for each applicable subsystem (indoor plumbing fixtures/fittings covering >=80%, irrigation, each makeup water system, commercial kitchen if >=100 meals/day, laundry if >=120,000 lb/yr), with real-time data access and hourly recording. Option 2 Leak Detection Sensors: install permanent flow meters/sensors on irrigation entry, >=50% of flush fixtures, and each makeup water system, triggering alarms on abnormal flow or detected leaks, plus a documented action plan. Healthcare and residential projects have tailored requirements.

二选一得 1 分。路径一子表计量：为各适用子系统安装永久水表（室内器具配件覆盖≥80%、灌溉、各补给水系统、日供餐≥100 份的商业厨房、年洗衣≥120,000 磅的洗衣房），数据可实时访问且至少每小时记录。路径二漏损检测传感器：在灌溉入口、≥50% 冲水器具及各补给水系统安装永久流量表/传感器，异常流量或检测到漏水时报警，并制定行动计划。医疗与住宅项目有专门要求。

• Option 1 requires submetering of major subsystems; real-time access via BMS/cloud/app and hourly recording are mandatory.
• Option 2 needs leak detection on irrigation entry, at least 50% of flush fixtures, and every makeup water system, with alarms and an action plan.
• Healthcare projects must submeter five additional specialized subsystems (e.g., RO water, dietary, lab, surgical suite) or all applicable ones.
• Residential projects meter each dwelling unit's total potable use; Core & Shell must provide future tenant metering (min. one meter per floor).
• Early design-phase planning of submeters optimizes placement, piping, and cost while revealing the largest water consumers.

• 路径一要求对主要子系统子表计量；强制要求通过 BMS/云/App 实时访问且至少每小时记录。
• 路径二须在灌溉入口、至少 50% 冲水器具、各补给水系统安装漏损检测，并具备报警与行动计划。
• 医疗项目须对五个额外专门子系统（如反渗透水、配餐、实验室、手术间）或所有适用系统子表计量。
• 住宅项目逐户计量总饮用水用量；Core & Shell 须为未来租户预留计量（每层至少一块表）。
• 在设计早期规划子表可优化布置、管线和成本，并揭示最大用水环节。

To further reduce potable water consumption and its associated energy and carbon, and to reward the use of alternative water sources that preserve potable supplies.

进一步降低饮用水消耗及其相关能源与碳排放，并奖励使用能保护饮用水供应的替代水源。

Either pursue Option 1 Whole-Project Water Use (up to 8 NC / 7 C&S points via 30-65% reduction from a water-balance baseline, with extra points for alternative water), OR combine Options 2-6 (max 8/7 points): Option 2 Fixture/Fittings calculated reduction (30-40%, 1-3 pts); Option 3 Appliance/Process Water (1-2 pts); Option 4 Outdoor (No Irrigation 2-3 pts, or Efficient Irrigation 50-100% TIR, 1-3 pts); Option 5 Optimize Process Water (cooling tower cycles, cooling optimization, or alternative process water, 1-3 pts); Option 6 Water Reuse (reuse-ready 1 pt, or alternative water sources 2 pts). All use a USGBC calculator where applicable.

可走路径一整项目用水（NC 最高 8 分 / C&S 最高 7 分，在水平衡基准上降低 30%-65%，使用替代水源额外加分），或组合路径二至六（最高 8/7 分）：路径二器具配件计算减排（30%-40%，1-3 分）；路径三设备/工艺用水（1-2 分）；路径四室外（无灌溉 2-3 分，或高效灌溉 TIR 降 50%-100%，1-3 分）；路径五优化工艺用水（冷却塔循环、冷却优化或替代工艺水，1-3 分）；路径六水回用（预留系统 1 分，或替代水源 2 分）。适用处均使用 USGBC 计算器。

• Option 1 uses a whole-project water balance model comparing baseline vs. design-case; reductions of 30-65% earn 1-8 (NC) or 1-7 (C&S) points, with bonus points for alternative water use.
• Options 2-6 can be mixed but cannot be combined with Option 1; fixture/fitting and outdoor savings build on the WEp2 baselines.
• Option 5 rewards higher cooling-tower concentration cycles (via water analysis of Ca, alkalinity, SiO2, Cl-, conductivity) and alternative-water cooling strategies.
• Option 6 promotes water reuse: a reuse-ready (future-capable) piping system earns 1 point, while implemented on-site or municipal reclaimed water earns 2 points.
• Alternative water sources (graywater, rainwater, reclaimed, condensate, etc.) are central; efficiency should be prioritized before applying reuse solutions, and source quality must suit the end use.

• 路径一采用整项目水平衡模型对比基准与设计工况；降低 30%-65% 可得 NC 1-8 分或 C&S 1-7 分，使用替代水源另有加分。
• 路径二至六可混合，但不可与路径一并用；器具配件与室外节水均在 WEp2 基准之上累加。
• 路径五奖励更高的冷却塔浓缩倍数（基于 Ca、碱度、SiO2、Cl-、电导率的用水分析）及替代水冷却策略。
• 路径六鼓励水回用：预留（面向未来）回用管线系统得 1 分，已实施的现场或市政再生水得 2 分。
• 替代水源（灰水、雨水、再生水、冷凝水等）是核心；应先提升效率再考虑回用，且水源水质须匹配用途。

To let building stakeholders visualize how today's design decisions will affect long-term operational carbon emissions, and to ensure low-carbon outcomes are planned from a project's inception.

使建筑利益相关方能够直观了解当前设计决策对长期运行碳排放的影响，并确保从项目伊始就规划低碳成果。

Four components must all be met: (1) Design Analysis—analyze efficiency, peak-load reduction, and decarbonization measures early using a simplified energy model, analysis of similar projects, or published data; (2) Site Energy Estimate—estimate annual site energy by source and submit to USGBC; (3) Review Carbon Projection—USGBC generates a 25-year business-as-usual (BAU) projection assuming grids decarbonize ~95% over that period; projects subject to a building performance standard (BPS) must create an ordinance-specific BAU and calculate expected fees; (4) Decarbonization Plan—Path 1 requires earning 4 or 5 points in EAc1 Electrification, or Path 2 requires a narrative of no more than two pages describing future retrofits, timeline, cost, discarded equipment, and electrification-readiness strategies.

须同时满足四项：①设计分析——在设计早期采用简化能源模型、类似项目分析或公开数据，分析能效、峰值负荷削减与脱碳措施；②现场能源估算——按能源种类估算年度现场能耗并提交 USGBC；③审查碳预测——USGBC 生成 25 年「照常营业」（BAU）预测，假设电网在该期间脱碳约 95%，受建筑性能标准（BPS）约束的项目须制作符合法规的 BAU 并核算预期罚款；④脱碳计划——路径 1 须在 EAc1 电气化中获得 4 或 5 分，路径 2 须提交不超过两页的叙述，说明未来改造、时间表、成本、被淘汰设备及电气化就绪策略。

• Electricity carbon falls toward zero by 2050 as grids decarbonize, but on-site combustion emissions stay constant—a key distinction for 2050 neutrality.
• The BAU projection visualizes 25 years of emissions assuming no operational change; buildings not substantially electrified must plan future retrofits.
• Smaller or less complex projects are not required to build a full energy model.
• Electrification-readiness (oversized panels, conduit, enhanced envelope, low-temp distribution) reduces future retrofit cost and disruption.
• Core and Shell analyzes anticipated tenant loads; Path 1 requires sufficient base-building systems to serve future tenants.

• 随着电网脱碳，电力碳排放在 2050 年前趋近于零，而现场燃烧排放保持不变——这是实现 2050 中和的关键区别。
• BAU 预测在「运营不变」假设下展示 25 年排放；未充分电气化的建筑须规划未来改造。
• 较小或较简单的项目不强制要求建立完整能源模型。
• 电气化就绪（加大配电盘、预留管线、强化围护、低温配送）可降低未来改造的成本与扰动。
• 核心与外壳项目须分析预期租户负荷；路径 1 要求基础建筑系统足以服务未来租户。

To promote resilience and reduce the environmental and economic harms of excessive energy use and greenhouse gas emissions by achieving a minimum level of energy efficiency.

通过达到最低能效水平，提升韧性并减少过度能耗与温室气体排放带来的环境和经济危害。

Choose Option 1 (ASHRAE 90.1-2019 with Addendum cr) or Option 2 (ASHRAE 90.1-2022). Projects registering on or after January 1, 2028 must use the 2022 version. Compliance follows one of the ASHRAE 90.1 Section 4.2.1 paths: Prescriptive Method, Energy Cost Budget (ECB) Method, or Appendix G Performance Rating Method (PRM). For PRM, teams may substitute a future source energy metric (electric site-to-source factor of 2.0) for cost. A building-envelope backstop limits envelope trade-offs. All mandatory provisions (Sections 5.4–10.4) must be met. ASHRAE 90.1-2022 adds Section 11 Additional Efficiency Requirements, a prescriptive on-site renewable requirement (with exceptions), and thermal-bridging provisions. IECC 2021 and 2024 are approved equivalents.

选择方案 1（ASHRAE 90.1-2019 含 Addendum cr）或方案 2（ASHRAE 90.1-2022）。2028 年 1 月 1 日及之后注册的项目必须使用 2022 版。合规采用 ASHRAE 90.1 第 4.2.1 节的路径之一：规定性方法、能源成本预算（ECB）方法或附录 G 性能评级方法（PRM）。在 PRM 中可用未来源能源指标（电力站点-源转换系数 2.0）替代成本。围护结构回退条款限制围护交易。所有强制性条款（第 5.4–10.4 节）均须满足。ASHRAE 90.1-2022 新增第 11 节「附加能效要求」、规定性现场可再生能源要求（含例外）以及热桥条款。IECC 2021 与 2024 为等效标准。

• ASHRAE 90.1-2022 yields about 14% net average site-energy savings versus 2019.
• Prescriptive = system-by-system compliance; ECB and PRM allow whole-building trade-offs but keep an envelope backstop.
• On-site renewable is prescriptively required in 90.1-2022 (avg >4% savings) with exceptions for poor solar access, small buildings, and low-carbon grids.
• The PRM performance index scale runs from 1 (minimal 90.1-2004 compliance) to 0 (net zero).
• Using a single ASHRAE version across EAp2, EAp3, and EAp4 streamlines documentation.

• ASHRAE 90.1-2022 较 2019 版实现约 14% 的净平均现场节能。
• 规定性方法逐系统合规；ECB 与 PRM 允许整体权衡，但须保留围护回退。
• 90.1-2022 规定性要求现场可再生能源（平均节能 >4%），例外包括太阳能条件差、小型建筑及低碳电网。
• PRM 性能指标（PI）标尺从 1（最低 90.1-2004 合规）到 0（净零）。
• 在 EAp2、EAp3、EAp4 中统一采用同一 ASHRAE 版本可简化文件工作。

To improve energy performance and limit greenhouse gas emissions by verifying that building systems operate according to the owner's project requirements (OPR).

通过核验建筑各系统按业主项目需求（OPR）运行，改善能效并限制温室气体排放。

Comply with ASHRAE 90.1 commissioning (Section 4.2.5) for building systems, controls, and envelope, with no exceptions to 4.2.5.2. Referenced standard: 2019 or later for pre-2028 registrations, 2022 or later for on/after 2028. The owner must designate a commissioning provider (CxP) by the end of design development, with experience on at least two similar projects. The CxP develops/updates the OPR (covering HVAC, service water heating, power, lighting, other equipment including on-site renewables, and envelope), reviews the basis of design, attends design meetings, reviews submittals, attends 50% and 100% milestone meetings, performs a sample QA/QC review of at least 10% of contractor documents, and develops an ongoing commissioning plan. Achieving EAc5 Option 1 automatically satisfies this prerequisite.

遵循 ASHRAE 90.1 第 4.2.5 节对建筑系统、控制与围护的调试要求，且不得援引 4.2.5.2 例外。参考标准：2028 年前注册用 2019 或更新版，2028 年及之后用 2022 或更新版。业主须在设计开发阶段结束前指定调试服务商（CxP），其须具备至少两个类似项目的经验。CxP 制定/更新 OPR（涵盖暖通空调、生活热水、电力、照明、含现场可再生能源的其他设备以及围护），审查设计依据，参加设计会议，审查送审文件，出席 50% 与 100% 里程碑会议，对至少 10% 承包文件进行抽样 QA/QC 审查，并制定持续调试计划。达成 EAc5 方案 1 即自动满足本先决条件。

• The CxP must be independent of the design/construction team, with documented conflict-of-interest handling if affiliated.
• Verification and Testing (V&T) providers perform functional performance testing and envelope air-leakage testing.
• Commissioned systems span envelope, HVAC, service water heating, power, lighting, on-site renewables, monitoring, refrigeration, and storage.
• Whole-building air-leakage testing is required for buildings under 25,000 sq ft under ASHRAE 90.1-2022.
• Core and Shell commissions only systems within the base-building scope and defers tests tied to future tenant equipment.

• CxP 须独立于设计与施工团队，如有关联须书面说明利益冲突处理方式。
• 验证与测试（V&T）服务商负责功能性能测试及围护气密性测试。
• 调试系统涵盖围护、暖通空调、生活热水、电力、照明、现场可再生能源、监测、制冷与储能。
• 按 ASHRAE 90.1-2022，小于 25,000 平方英尺的建筑须进行整栋气密性测试。
• 核心与外壳仅调试基础建筑范围内的系统，并推迟与未来租户设备相关的测试。

To support energy management practices and facilitate identification of ongoing opportunities for energy and GHG savings by tracking and reporting building energy use and demand.

通过追踪并报告建筑能耗与需量，支撑能源管理实践并便于识别持续的节能与减碳机会。

Two parts: (1) Energy Monitoring and Recording—install/use devices per ASHRAE 90.1 (version by registration date) to monitor and record energy by source, including separately metered on-site renewable generation. Small buildings (<25,000 sf commercial; <10,000 sf residential common space) and major renovations need only monthly whole-building source metering plus peak demand. ASHRAE-subject projects require 15-minute interval metering of total electricity and submetering (HVAC, interior/exterior lighting, receptacles; 90.1-2022 adds refrigeration), data retention of 36 months, hourly/daily/monthly/annual reporting, graphic display for digital-control buildings, and tenant submetering above 10,000 sf. (2) Report Energy Data—commit to annually reporting to USGBC for at least five years: monthly data for 12 months, consumption by source, on-site renewable generation, and peak electrical demand.

两部分：①能源监测与记录——按 ASHRAE 90.1（依注册日期选版本）安装/使用设备按能源种类监测记录能耗，含单独计量的现场可再生能源发电。小型建筑（商用 <25,000 平方英尺；住宅公共区域 <10,000 平方英尺）与重大改造仅需按月记录整栋分项能耗及峰值需量。受 ASHRAE 约束的项目须以 15 分钟间隔计量总用电及分项（暖通、室内/外照明、插座；90.1-2022 增制冷），数据保留 36 个月，支持按时/日/月/年报告，数字化控制建筑须图形显示，大于 10,000 平方英尺租户须分项计量。②报告能源数据——承诺至少五年每年向 USGBC 报告：连续 12 个月月度数据、各能源种类消耗量、现场可再生发电量及峰值电力需量。

• Plan submetering early—late electrical design changes substantially raise cost.
• On-site renewables must be separately metered (15-minute for ASHRAE projects; monthly for small/renovation).
• Reporting to USGBC enables benchmarking across the LEED portfolio and links with ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager.
• Submetering EV charging is recommended so it can be excluded from efficiency calculations.
• Residential projects may use per-dwelling meters plus central common-area metering in lieu of whole-building reporting.

• 须尽早规划分项计量——后期电气设计变更会显著推高成本。
• 现场可再生能源须单独计量（ASHRAE 项目 15 分钟间隔；小型/改造项目按月）。
• 向 USGBC 报告可在 LEED 组合中实现对标，并与 ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager 对接。
• 建议对电动汽车充电设施单独分项计量，以便从能效计算中剔除。
• 住宅项目可用逐户计量加公共区域集中计量替代整栋报告。

To reduce greenhouse gas emissions from refrigerants by accelerating the phaseout of high-global-warming-potential (GWP) refrigerants and by reducing refrigerant leakage.

通过加速淘汰高全球变暖潜值（GWP）制冷剂并减少制冷剂泄漏，降低制冷剂产生的温室气体排放。

Option 1 (No Refrigerants): use no refrigerant equipment (devices under 0.5 lb are exempt). Option 2 (Refrigerants) requires: a complete refrigerant inventory (type, GWP, charge, total GWP) for all equipment in scope plus existing owner equipment; no HCFC refrigerants in new equipment; evaluation of alternatives during design for any refrigerant with GWP > 700; and a leak check and repair prior to substantial completion (with vacuum/pressure testing for field-assembled joints before charging). Renovations must properly recover, recycle, reclaim, or destroy removed refrigerants per EPA/EC regulations.

方案 1（无制冷剂）：不使用含制冷剂设备（低于 0.5 磅的设备豁免）。方案 2（含制冷剂）须：对范围内所有设备及业主既有设备建立完整制冷剂清单（种类、GWP、充注量、总 GWP）；新设备不得采用 HCFC 制冷剂；对 GWP > 700 的制冷剂在设计阶段评估替代方案；在实质性完工前进行检漏与修复（现场拼接管路在充注前须做真空/压力测试）。改造项目须按 EPA/欧盟法规对拆除的制冷剂进行回收、再利用、再处理或销毁。

• GWP is assessed per IPCC AR4 or later; common high-GWP examples include R-410A (2088) and R-134a (1430), while natural refrigerants (R-290, R-744 CO2, R-717 ammonia) are near zero.
• Develop a list of GWP ≤ 700 alternatives early; if >700 is impractical, consider reclaimed refrigerant.
• Equipment under 0.5 lb (e.g., residential refrigerators) is excluded from the inventory.
• Field-assembled piping needs vacuum and pressure testing to limit leakage.
• Core and Shell inventories base-building and owner equipment, excluding tenant equipment not in scope.

• GWP 按 IPCC 第四次评估报告或更新版评估；常见高 GWP 如 R-410A（2088）、R-134a（1430），天然制冷剂（R-290、R-744 CO2、R-717 氨）接近零。
• 尽早制定 GWP ≤ 700 的替代清单；若 >700 不可行，可考虑再生制冷剂。
• 低于 0.5 磅的设备（如住宅冰箱）不计入清单。
• 现场拼接管路须做真空与压力测试以控制泄漏。
• 核心与外壳仅统计基础建筑及业主设备，不含范围外的租户设备。

To encourage building design that avoids on-site fuel combustion, which improves indoor and outdoor air quality and enables low-carbon operations as the grid decarbonizes.

鼓励建筑设计避免现场燃料燃烧，从而改善室内外空气品质，并在电网脱碳过程中实现低碳运营。

New Construction: Option 1 (No On-Site Combustion, 5 points) requires no on-site combustion except emergency support, with a combined weighted-average COP of at least 1.8 for space heating and service water heating. Option 2 (No On-Site Combustion Except at Low Temperatures, 1–4 points) combines Path 1 Space Heating (2), Path 2 Service Water Heating (1), and Path 3 Cooking/Other Process (1); climate zones 3+ need ≥1.8 COP for heating. Core and Shell offers Electrification (Path 1 no combustion 3–4 pts; Path 2 low-temp 1–3 pts; Path 3 limited scope 1–2 pts) or Electrification Readiness (1 pt) with infrastructure for future heat pumps. Fuel cells using fossil fuel and CHP are ineligible. Low temperature means outside-air dry-bulb below 20°F (−6.5°C).

新建筑：方案 1（无现场燃烧，5 分）要求除应急支持外无现场燃烧，且空间供暖与生活热水的加权平均 COP 至少 1.8。方案 2（除低温外无现场燃烧，1–4 分）可组合路径 1 空间供暖（2 分）、路径 2 生活热水（1 分）、路径 3 烹饪/其他工艺（1 分）；3 区及以上供暖须 ≥1.8 COP。核心与外壳提供电气化（路径 1 无燃烧 3–4 分；路径 2 低温 1–3 分；路径 3 有限范围 1–2 分）或电气化就绪（1 分，预留未来热泵基础设施）。使用化石燃料的燃料电池及热电联产不符合资格。低温指室外空气干球温度低于 20°F（−6.5°C）。

• The 1.8 COP threshold steers projects toward efficient heat pumps rather than electric resistance heating, limiting added grid peak demand.
• Some equipment is excluded from the COP calculation: climate zones 0–2 heating, supplemental low-temperature heating, and compliant nonresidential point-of-use water heaters.
• Exemptions allow combustion for emergency support, limited portable equipment, and special cases (e.g., wood-fired ovens with emissions control, lab equipment).
• Platinum requires full electrification (5 NC / 4 CS points).
• Weighted-average COP can be shown via a streamlined method, energy simulation, or rated capacities.

• 1.8 的 COP 门槛引导项目采用高效热泵而非电阻加热，以限制新增电网峰值需量。
• 部分设备不计入 COP：0–2 区供暖、补充性低温供暖，以及合规的非住宅即热式水加热器。
• 例外允许应急支持、有限的便携式设备以及特殊情况（如带排放控制的柴火炉、实验室设备）使用燃烧。
• 铂级要求完全电气化（新建筑 5 分 / 核心与外壳 4 分）。
• 加权平均 COP 可通过简化法、能源模拟或额定容量法证明。

To minimize demand on grid resources and improve the resilience of buildings.

最大限度降低对电网资源的需求，并提升建筑的韧性。

The envelope must meet ASHRAE 90.1 Section 5.5 or 5.6 (no envelope-vs-system trade-offs). Combine Options 1–4 (max 5 points): Option 1 Infiltration and Balanced Ventilation (1 pt; residential 2) — balanced supply/exhaust within 10% plus air-leakage testing below Table 1 caps; Option 2 Ventilation Energy Recovery (1 pt) — ERV/HRV with ≥70% enthalpy or ≥75% sensible recovery on each OA fan system; Option 3 Thermal Bridging (1 pt) — ASHRAE 90.1-2022 Section 5.5.5(a) without exceptions in climate zones 0–3; Option 4 Peak Thermal Load Reductions (1–3 pts) with preconditions (ventilation loads included, measured air leakage, balanced ventilation) and Path 1 Peak Load Intensity (sum peak heating+cooling per treated floor area: 16/12/8 Btu-h/sf = 1/2/3 pts), Path 2 ASHRAE trade-off methods (envelope 10%/20% = 1/2 pts; ventilation 10% via TSPR = 1 pt), or Path 3 Energy Simulation (PRM using peak loads in place of cost: PI 0.5/0.4/0.3 = 1/2/3 pts).

围护须满足 ASHRAE 90.1 第 5.5 或 5.6 节（不允许围护与其他系统交易）。可组合方案 1–4（最高 5 分）：方案 1 渗透与平衡通风（1 分；住宅 2 分）——送排风偏差在 10% 内且气密性测试低于表 1 上限；方案 2 通风能量回收（1 分）——各新风风机配备 ≥70% 焓回收或 ≥75% 显热回收的 ERV/HRV；方案 3 热桥（1 分）——ASHRAE 90.1-2022 第 5.5.5(a) 节且在 0–3 区无例外；方案 4 峰值热负荷削减（1–3 分）须满足前提（含通风负荷、实测气密性、平衡通风），路径 1 峰值负荷强度（单位处理楼面峰值供暖+制冷之和：16/12/8 Btu-h/平方英尺 = 1/2/3 分），路径 2 ASHRAE 交易法（围护 10%/20% = 1/2 分；通风经 TSPR 降 10% = 1 分），或路径 3 能源模拟（PRM 以峰值负荷替代成本：PI 0.5/0.4/0.3 = 1/2/3 分）。

• Reducing peak loads eases grid strain during summer/winter peaks when emissions and capacity stress are highest.
• Passive House designs (PHIUS/PHI) typically earn the full 3 points under Path 1.
• No envelope-vs-system trade-offs are allowed—a higher bar than EAp2.
• Option 1 and Option 4 require construction-phase verification of measured air leakage and balanced ventilation.
• Core and Shell: Options 1 and 3 drop the balanced-ventilation requirement; Option 2 needs ≥50% of ventilation air in base scope.

• 削减峰值负荷可缓解夏冬高峰期的电网压力，此时排放与容量压力最大。
• 被动房设计（PHIUS/PHI）在路径 1 通常可获得满分 3 分。
• 不允许围护与其他系统交易——门槛高于 EAp2。
• 方案 1 与方案 4 须在施工阶段核验实测气密性与平衡通风。
• 核心与外壳：方案 1、3 免除平衡通风要求；方案 2 须基础范围内含 ≥50% 通风空气。

To design buildings that minimize energy use, reducing the environmental damage from resource extraction, air pollution, and GHG emissions, and to facilitate the transition to a clean-energy future.

设计能耗最低的建筑，减少资源开采、空气污染与温室气体排放带来的环境损害，并推动向清洁能源未来转型。

New Construction: Option 1 Prescriptive Path (1–10) combines Path 1 Regulated Loads (Case 1 ASHRAE 90.1-2019, 1–5 pts pre-2028 only; Case 2 ASHRAE 90.1-2022, 4–7 pts where 4 auto-awarded for prerequisite compliance, +1 per 25 incremental credits) and Path 2 Plug & Process Loads (1–4: Case 1 dashboard/management, Case 2 efficient ENERGY STAR equipment, Case 3 exceptional calculation 10–40% = 1–4). Option 2 Energy Simulation (1–10) uses ASHRAE 90.1 Appendix G PRM with the future source energy metric (electric site-to-source 2.0), replacing BPFs; Path 1 excludes on-site renewables (3–30% reduction = 1–10 pts), Path 2 includes them (10–100% = 1–10 pts). Core and Shell uses scaled point tables (Option 1 up to 7; Option 2 up to 7). Platinum requires 8 (NC) / 5 (CS) points.

新建筑：方案 1 规定性路径（1–10）组合路径 1 受控负荷（案例 1 ASHRAE 90.1-2019，仅 2028 年前 1–5 分；案例 2 ASHRAE 90.1-2022，4–7 分，其中 4 分随先决条件合规自动获得，每多 25 个增量学分加 1 分）与路径 2 插头及工艺负荷（1–4：案例 1 看板/管理，案例 2 高效 ENERGY STAR 设备，案例 3 特殊计算 10–40% = 1–4 分）。方案 2 能源模拟（1–10）采用 ASHRAE 90.1 附录 G PRM 与未来源能源指标（电力站点-源系数 2.0）并替换 BPF；路径 1 排除现场可再生（降幅 3–30% = 1–10 分），路径 2 计入（10–100% = 1–10 分）。核心与外壳采用缩比积分表（方案 1 最高 7；方案 2 最高 7）。铂级须 8（新建筑）/ 5（核心与外壳）分。

• The prescriptive path is a new LEED v5 alternative to energy modeling—no simulation required for regulated loads.
• Use the same ASHRAE 90.1 version and compliance method as EAp2 to streamline documentation.
• Option 2 deliberately prioritizes efficiency: Path 2 (including renewables) thresholds are more than three times stricter than Path 1.
• Eligible Section 11 measures for points are HVAC (H01–H07), SWH (W01–W09), lighting (L01–L06), and building mass/night flush (G07); envelope (E01) and renewables (R01) are rewarded elsewhere.
• Plug/process loads represent 30–50% of building energy and are addressed via dashboards, ENERGY STAR equipment, or exceptional calculations.

• 规定性路径是 LEED v5 新增的替代能源模拟之法——受控负荷无需建模。
• 与 EAp2 采用同一 ASHRAE 90.1 版本与合规方法可简化文件。
• 方案 2 刻意优先能效：计入可再生（路径 2）的门槛比排除（路径 1）严格三倍以上。
• 可获积分的第 11 节措施为暖通（H01–H07）、生活热水（W01–W09）、照明（L01–L06）及建筑蓄热/夜间通风（G07）；围护（E01）与可再生（R01）在其他条款奖励。
• 插头/工艺负荷占建筑能耗 30–50%，可通过看板、ENERGY STAR 设备或特殊计算来体现。

To encourage and recognize the use of renewable energy to reduce the environmental and economic impacts of fossil-fuel energy use and to increase the supply of new renewable energy on the grid, fostering a just transition to a green economy.

鼓励并认可可再生能源的使用，以减少化石能源使用的环境与经济影响，并增加电网中新可再生能源的供应，推动迈向绿色经济的公正转型。

Option 1 Renewable Energy Supply or Procurement (NC 1–5, CS 1–4) uses a three-tier hierarchy: Tier 1 on-site generation or social-impact project (PV, solar thermal, wind, recovered municipal wastewater heat) via minimum rated capacity (A×1 or 2 W/sf = 1–2 pts) or % of annual site energy (5/10/20/35/100% = 1–5 pts); Tier 2 new off-site renewable electricity (generator operational within 2 yrs of occupancy or COD within 5 yrs of contract: 20/40/60/80/100% = 1–5 pts); Tier 3 off-site Green-e certified RECs/fuels (50/100% = 1–2 pts). Tiers combine to the maximum. All require a 10-year contract (or prorated), retirement of EACs/RECs to the project, vintage within 18 months of submission, and same-country/region location. Option 2 Renewable Energy Readiness (CS only, 1 pt) provides a solar-ready design (≥40% roof solar zone, structural analysis, interconnection pathways, reserved 200A panel space). Platinum requires 100% site (NC) or base-building (CS) renewable energy.

方案 1 可再生能源供应或采购（新建筑 1–5，核心与外壳 1–4）采用三级体系：一级现场发电或社会影响项目（光伏、太阳能热、风能、回收市政污水余热），按最低额定容量（A×1 或 2 W/平方英尺 = 1–2 分）或年现场能源占比（5/10/20/35/100% = 1–5 分）；二级新建场外可再生电力（发电机在 occupancy 后 2 年内投运或合同签订前 5 年内 COD：20/40/60/80/100% = 1–5 分）；三级 Green-e 认证的场外 REC/燃料（50/100% = 1–2 分）。各级可累计至上限。均须 10 年合同（或按比例）、EAC/REC 归属项目、提交前 18 个月内生成、同国/同区域。方案 2 可再生能源就绪（仅核心与外壳，1 分）提供太阳能就绪设计（≥40% 屋面太阳能区、结构分析、互联通道、预留 200A 配电盘空间）。铂级须 100% 现场（新建筑）或基础建筑（核心与外壳）可再生能源。

• Tier 1 on-site systems must be commissioned per EAp3 (and EAc5 Path 1 if pursued).
• Net-metered electricity counts up to 100% of annual electricity plus district energy use.
• EV-charging energy is excluded if separately metered.
• Geoexchange/geothermal heat pumps are NOT renewable here—they are credited under EAc3.
• A social-impact project installs free renewable systems on historically marginalized communities' sites, transferring ownership and power rights.

• 一级现场系统须按 EAp3 调试（若采用 EAc5 路径 1 亦须满足）。
• 净计量电力可计入至年度用电加区域能源的 100%。
• 电动汽车充电能源若单独计量则不计入。
• 地源/地热热泵在此不算可再生——其积分在 EAc3。
• 社会影响项目在历史边缘化社区场址免费安装可再生系统，并转移所有权与用电权利。

To further ensure that building systems operate as designed and continue to deliver their expected energy performance over the building's life.

进一步确保建筑各系统按设计运行，并在建筑全生命周期内持续维持预期的能效表现。

New Construction: Option 1 Enhanced Commissioning (1–3) requires an independent CxP designated in predesign or very early design. Path 1 MEP Systems (2 pts) follows ASHRAE 202-2024 across mechanical, electrical, plumbing, controls, data center, process, monitoring, and renewable systems, with at least two design-phase meetings and confirmation of training. Path 2 Building Enclosure (1 pt) follows ASTM E2947-21a with required field testing (air leakage, water penetration, infrared imaging). Paths combine for 3 points and auto-satisfy EAp3. Option 2 Monitoring-Based Commissioning (1–2) requires a minimum three-year MBCx commitment and a remotely accessible Energy Information System; Path 1 Basic Software earns 1 point and Path 2 Enhanced Software (with fault detection and diagnostics for large HVAC/refrigeration >600 tons) earns 2 points. Core and Shell offers Enclosure (1), Enclosure+MEP (2), or MBCx (1).

新建筑：方案 1 增强调试（1–3）要求在设计前期或极早期指定独立 CxP。路径 1 机电系统（2 分）遵循 ASHRAE 202-2024，覆盖机械、电气、给排水、控制、数据中心、工艺、监测与可再生系统，须至少两次设计阶段会议并确认培训。路径 2 建筑围护（1 分）遵循 ASTM E2947-21a，含强制现场测试（气密、水渗透、红外成像）。两路径合计 3 分并自动满足 EAp3。方案 2 监测型调试（1–2）要求至少三年 MBCx 承诺及远程可访问能源信息系统；路径 1 基础软件 1 分，路径 2 增强软件（含大型暖通/制冷 >600 冷吨的故障检测诊断）2 分。核心与外壳提供围护（1）、围护+机电（2）或 MBCx（1）。

• Early CxP engagement (predesign) is essential; limited portfolio/owner-employee exceptions exist.
• Enhanced scope broadens beyond energy to water efficiency, air quality, and thermal comfort.
• Tier 1 renewables and EAc6 grid-interactive controls are included in the MEP commissioning scope.
• Fault detection and diagnostics may use AI/machine learning or specialist knowledge-driven methods, covering ≥60% of large-capacity equipment.
• Achieving both Option 1 paths automatically fulfills the EAp3 Fundamental Commissioning prerequisite.

• CxP 须尽早（设计前期）介入；仅存在有限的组合/业主雇员例外。
• 增强调试范围由能效拓展至节水、空气品质与热舒适。
• 一级可再生能源与 EAc6 电网互动控制纳入机电调试范围。
• 故障检测诊断可采用 AI/机器学习或专家知识驱动法，覆盖大型设备 ≥60% 容量。
• 同时完成方案 1 两路径即自动满足 EAp3 基础调试先决条件。

To enhance power resilience and position buildings as active partners contributing to grid decarbonization, reliability, and power affordability through integrated management of building loads in response to variable grid conditions.

通过集成管理建筑负荷以响应多变的电网状况，提升电力韧性，并使建筑成为助力电网脱碳、可靠与可负担的主动伙伴。

Projects must first evaluate grid-interactive measures for their context and provide interval-recording meters plus equipment capable of accepting an external signal. Combine Options 1–4: Option 1 Energy Storage (1–2) — on-site electric (0.2/0.4 kWh per kW of peak demand) or thermal storage (1.0/2.0 kWh per kW) with automatic load management; Option 2 Demand Response (1) — enroll ≥1-year DR contract with a qualified provider; Option 3 Automated Demand-Side Management (1) — Path 1 system-level ADR controls for ≥2 systems (HVAC 50% capacity, lighting 50% power, SWH 90%, EVSE) or Path 2 Building Automation System shedding ≥10% peak demand for ≥1 hour; Option 4 Power Resilience (1) — island and power critical loads via on-site renewable + storage for ≥72 hours. On-site generation/combustion cannot satisfy demand-response criteria.

项目须先评估适用于自身背景的电网互动措施，并配置间隔记录电表及可接收外部信号的设备。可组合方案 1–4：方案 1 储能（1–2）——现场电力（每 kW 峰值需量 0.2/0.4 kWh）或蓄热（1.0/2.0 kWh/kW）并配自动负荷管理；方案 2 需求响应（1）——与合格供应商签订 ≥1 年 DR 合同；方案 3 自动需求侧管理（1）——路径 1 对 ≥2 个系统（暖通 50% 容量、照明 50% 功率、生活热水 90%、EVSE）设 ADR 控制，或路径 2 楼宇自控系统削减 ≥10% 峰值需量持续 ≥1 小时；方案 4 电力韧性（1）——借助现场可再生+储能在离网状态下为关键负荷供电 ≥72 小时。现场发电/燃烧不可用于满足需求响应标准。

• Guidance references NBI GridOptimal, ASHRAE Grid-Interactive Building Guide, and DOE Grid-Interactive Efficient Buildings.
• EVSE peak demand may be excluded from peak-load determination if separately metered.
• Automated demand-side management must be included in the commissioning scope (links to EAc5).
• Power Resilience requires an automatic transfer switch enabling islanding with on-site renewables and storage.
• Core and Shell tenant leases must describe which systems are included in automatic DR control.

• 指南引用 NBI GridOptimal、ASHRAE 电网互动建筑指南与 DOE 电网互动高效建筑。
• 若单独计量，EVSE 峰值需量可从峰值负荷计算中剔除。
• 自动需求侧管理须纳入调试范围（与 EAc5 关联）。
• 电力韧性须配置自动转换开关，实现现场可再生与储能的离网运行。
• 核心与外壳租约须说明哪些系统纳入自动 DR 控制。

To reduce greenhouse gas emissions by accelerating the use of low-GWP refrigerants and promoting better refrigerant management practices.

通过加速采用低 GWP 制冷剂并推广更佳的制冷剂管理实践，减少温室气体排放。

Builds on EAp5; combine options up to 2 points. Option 1 No Refrigerants or Low GWP (1–2): Path 1 No Refrigerants (1 pt, no refrigerant equipment; Core and Shell ineligible if future equipment is needed), Path 2 Low GWP (1–2) where the weighted-average GWP of new equipment is ≤80% of benchmark for 1 point or ≤50% for 2 points (benchmarks: heat-pump water heaters 1400, HVAC/datacenter/process chillers 700, other process refrigeration 300; adjusted benchmarks allowed for low-charge equipment). Option 2 Limit Refrigerant Leakage (1, Core and Shell only with ≥20% capacity in scope) requires self-contained equipment (≥80% of total GWP, all GWP≥700 self-contained), brazed/press fittings, auto leak detection above 100 tCO2e, and an operational maintenance plan. Option 3 GreenChill Certification for food retailers (>20% gross area) earns Silver (1) or Gold/Platinum (2).

建立在 EAp5 之上；可组合各方案至 2 分。方案 1 无制冷剂或低 GWP（1–2）：路径 1 无制冷剂（1 分，无含制冷剂设备；核心与外壳若未来需设备则不符），路径 2 低 GWP（1–2）要求新设备加权平均 GWP ≤基准 80% 得 1 分、≤50% 得 2 分（基准：热泵热水器 1400、暖通/数据中心/工艺冷水机 700、其他工艺制冷 300；低充注设备可用调整后基准）。方案 2 限制制冷剂泄漏（1 分，仅核心与外壳且范围内容量 ≥20%）要求自带式设备（占总量 ≥80% GWP，所有 GWP≥700 均自带式）、钎焊/压接接头、>100 tCO2e 自动检漏及运维计划。方案 3 食品零售 GreenChill 认证（>20% 建筑面积）银级 1 分、金/铂级 2 分。

• Refrigerants can be over a thousand times more potent than CO2; mitigation grows critical as heat pumps proliferate through electrification.
• Benchmarks derive from the EPA 2023 AIM Act Technology Transitions Rule and align with EU F-Gas and Kigali Amendment limits.
• Low-charge equipment may use adjusted benchmarks based on refrigerant charge per unit of capacity.
• Option 2's maintenance plan sets leak-check frequencies scaled to charge size (e.g., quarterly above 500 tCO2e) and doubles testing if annual leakage exceeds 1%.
• Core and Shell may exclude future tenant equipment; district energy can be included in the GWP calculation when needed.

• 制冷剂温室效应可超二氧化碳千倍；随着电气化推动热泵普及，削减其影响愈发关键。
• 基准源自 EPA 2023 AIM 法案技术转换规则，并与欧盟 F-Gas 及《基加利修正案》限值一致。
• 低充注设备可按单位容量充注量采用调整后基准。
• 方案 2 运维计划按充注量设定检漏频次（如 >500 tCO2e 每季度），年泄漏超 1% 则检测加倍。
• 核心与外壳可排除未来租户设备；必要时区域能源可纳入 GWP 计算。

To minimize occupant-generated waste sent to landfills or incinerators through reduction, reuse, and recycling, conserving resources and preparing the building for successful zero-waste operations.

通过减量、再利用与回收，减少建筑使用者产生的、送往填埋或焚烧的废弃物，保护自然资源，并为建筑实现零废弃运营打下基础。

Required for New Construction and Core and Shell. Two components: (1) Storage and Collection of Recyclables — provide accessible dedicated areas for collecting recyclables including organics/food waste, mixed paper, cardboard, glass, plastics, and metals, plus safe handling of batteries, lamps, and e-waste; (2) Zero Waste Operations Planning — supply design details, maintenance manuals, and resources that help occupants and operators meet recycling and prevention goals. Core and Shell projects must communicate infrastructure and services in tenant guidelines.

新建与核心外壳项目均为必需。包含两部分：(1) 可回收物储存与收集——提供可达的专用区域，收集有机/厨余、混合纸、纸板、玻璃、塑料、金属等可回收物，并安全处理电池、含汞灯具及电子废弃物；(2) 零废弃运营规划——提供设计细节、维护手册等资源，帮助使用者和运营方达成回收与减废目标。核心外壳项目须在租户指南中说明基础设施与服务。

• Dedicated, accessible collection/storage areas are required for recyclables and organics, even if local composting service is unavailable at occupancy.
• Follow the TRUE waste hierarchy: reduce, reuse, recycle, compost, then anaerobic digestion — in that order of preference.
• Safe handling areas must be provided for hazardous items such as batteries, mercury lamps, and e-waste.
• A zero-waste operations plan with maintenance manuals and training materials supports post-occupancy behavior change.
• Core and Shell teams communicate waste infrastructure in tenant guidelines; source separation is encouraged to maximize diversion.

• 必须为可回收物与有机废弃物设置专用、可达的收集与储存区，即便入住时尚无本地堆肥服务亦不可省略。
• 遵循 TRUE 废弃物层级：减量、再利用、回收、堆肥，最后厌氧消化，按优先顺序执行。
• 须为电池、含汞灯具、电子废弃物等危险品提供安全的收集与储存区域。
• 包含维护手册与培训材料的零废弃运营规划，有助于入住后行为改变。
• 核心外壳项目须在租户指南中说明废弃物设施；鼓励源头分类以最大化分流率。

To quantify the embodied carbon (GWP) of a project's structure, enclosure, and hardscape, and to identify and assess the top sources of embodied carbon.

量化项目结构、围护与硬景的隐含碳（GWP），识别并评估隐含碳的主要来源。

Required for New Construction and Core and Shell. Two components: (1) Embodied Carbon — quantify cradle-to-gate (A1–A3) GWP for structure, enclosure, and hardscape materials (including asphalt, concrete, masonry, steel, insulation, aluminum, wood, cladding, glass, and any ancillary structures). Use specific EPDs, EPA defaults, CLF baselines, or industry-wide EPDs per a data hierarchy; reused/salvaged materials count as zero A1–A3 GWP. (2) High-Priority Sources — identify the top three embodied carbon contributors and describe strategies considered to reduce them. May be met via MRc2 outputs. Core and Shell must share measurements and suppliers in tenant guidelines.

新建与核心外壳项目均为必需。包含两部分：(1) 隐含碳——量化结构、围护与硬景材料（含沥青、混凝土、砌体、钢材、保温、铝、木材、幕墙、玻璃及附属结构）从摇篮到大门（A1–A3）的 GWP；按数据层级使用具体 EPD、EPA 默认值、CLF 基准或行业 EPD；再利用/回收材料 A1–A3 计为零。(2) 高优先级来源——列出前三大隐含碳排放源，并说明考虑的减碳策略。可由 MRc2 的成果满足。核心外壳须在租户指南中共享数据与供应商信息。

• Focuses on structure, enclosure, and hardscape only — not operational energy or MEP equipment.
• Use a data hierarchy: product-specific EPDs first, then EPA/CLF defaults or regional industry-wide EPDs.
• Reused or salvaged materials are assigned zero A1–A3 GWP because extraction and manufacturing are avoided.
• A mandatory hot-spot analysis identifies the three largest carbon contributors to target reductions.
• Projects pursuing MRc2 can reuse its WBLCA analysis to satisfy this prerequisite without extra work.

• 仅关注结构、围护与硬景，不含运行能耗或机电设备。
• 遵循数据层级：优先产品专用 EPD，其次 EPA/CLF 默认值或区域行业 EPD。
• 再利用或回收材料在 A1–A3 阶段计为零 GWP，因其避免了开采与制造。
• 强制性的热点分析识别三大碳排放源，以锁定减排重点。
• 申报 MRc2 的项目可直接用其 WBLCA 分析满足本前提，无需额外工作。

To incorporate reused materials into new construction, lowering embodied carbon, keeping materials in circulation, reducing demand for virgin resources, and preserving both resources and building histories.

将再利用材料纳入新建项目，降低隐含碳，使材料保持循环，减少对原生资源的需求，并保护资源与建筑历史。

Two options, combinable. Option 1 (Building Reuse): maintain a percentage of the existing structure and enclosure (floor/roof decking, load-bearing elements, facade). NC points: 20%=1, 35%=2, 50%=3; CS points scale 10%–50% for up to 5 points. Option 2 (Materials Reuse): reuse nonstructural materials (targeted types like carpeting, ceilings, furniture, interior walls get a 2× weighting). Earn 2 points by reusing ≥30% of one targeted type, ≥15% of two targeted types, ≥15% of four other types, or an equivalent weighted average. A salvage assessment is required when deconstruction/demolition is in scope. Hazardous or structurally unsound portions are excluded. On-site reuse counts here; off-site salvage counts toward MRc5.

两个可叠加的选项。选项1（建筑再利用）：保留既有结构与围护（楼板、屋面板、承重构件、外立面）的一定比例。新建：20%=1分、35%=2分、50%=3分；核心外壳按10%–50%递增，最高5分。选项2（材料再利用）：再利用非结构材料（地毯、天花、家具、内墙等目标材料加权2倍）。满足以下之一即得2分：单一目标材料再利用≥30%、两类目标材料各≥15%、四类其他材料各≥15%，或等价的加权平均值。涉及拆除时需先做回收评估。危险或结构失稳部分排除。现场再利用计入本项，离场回收计入 MRc5。

• Option 1 rewards keeping existing structure and enclosure in place or incorporating off-site reused structural elements.
• Targeted nonstructural materials (carpet, ceilings, furniture, interior walls) earn a 2× multiplier versus other materials.
• A salvage assessment before deconstruction identifies on-site and off-site reuse opportunities.
• Structurally unsound or hazardous portions are excluded from credit calculations.
• Materials sent off-site for reuse count toward MRc5, while on-site reuse counts toward MRc1.

• 选项1奖励保留既有结构/围护或纳入离场回收的结构构件。
• 目标非结构材料（地毯、天花、家具、内墙）相较其他材料加权2倍。
• 拆除前的回收评估可识别现场与离场的再利用机会。
• 结构失稳或危险部分不计入得分计算。
• 离场再利用材料计入 MRc5，现场再利用计入 MRc1。

To track and reduce the embodied carbon of major structural, enclosure, and hardscape materials from construction processes on new and renovation projects.

追踪并降低新建与翻新项目中主要结构、围护及硬景材料在施工过程中的隐含碳。

Three combinable options. Option 1 (WBLCA): conduct a cradle-to-grave (A–C) whole-building LCA versus a baseline; NC up to 6 pts (40%+ reduction), CS up to 7 pts (50%+). Option 2 (EPD Analysis): Path 1 project-average approach compares procured materials to industry averages (NC up to 3, CS up to 4); Path 2 materials-type approach uses product-specific Type III EPDs for targeted types (NC up to 2, CS up to 3). Option 3 (Construction Tracking): track jobsite fuel/utility emissions — Path 1 contractor only (1 pt), Path 2 contractor + subcontractors (2 pts). Meeting only baseline/average earns no more than 2 points. Platinum requires a 20% GWP reduction.

三个可叠加选项。选项1（WBLCA）：开展从摇篮到坟墓（A–C）的全建筑生命周期评估并与基准对比；新建最高6分（减排40%+），核心外壳最高7分（减排50%+）。选项2（EPD 分析）：路径1 项目平均法将采购材料与行业平均值对比（新建最高3分，核心外壳最高4分）；路径2 材料类型法使用目标材料的产品专用 Type III EPD（新建最高2分，核心外壳最高3分）。选项3（施工追踪）：追踪施工现场燃料/能耗——路径1 仅总承包（1分），路径2 含分包（2分）。仅达基准/平均值最多2分。铂金级须减排20% GWP。

• WBLCA compares proposed design to a functionally equivalent baseline of at least 60-year service life using ISO-compliant tools.
• EPD analysis can follow a project-average or materials-type pathway, benchmarked against EPA, CLF, or regional industry-wide EPDs.
• Construction-phase (A5) emissions tracking is an emerging practice that rewards measurement, not required reduction.
• Meeting only the baseline or industry average caps the credit at 2 points, encouraging genuine reductions.
• Reused/salvaged materials are zeroed for A1–A3 in the WBLCA to reflect avoided manufacturing impacts.

• WBLCA 将提案与功能等效、服役期至少60年的基准对比，并使用符合 ISO 的工具。
• EPD 分析可走项目平均法或材料类型法，以 EPA、CLF 或区域行业 EPD 为基准。
• 施工阶段（A5）排放追踪是新兴做法，奖励测量行为而非强制减排。
• 仅达基准或行业平均值时本项上限为2分，以鼓励真实减排。
• WBLCA 中再利用/回收材料在 A1–A3 计为零，反映已避免的制造影响。

To lower concentrations of chemical contaminants that harm air quality and the environment, protecting the health and comfort of installers and occupants.

降低损害空气质量与环境的化学污染物浓度，保护安装人员与使用者的健康与舒适。

Specify and install products in covered categories meeting low-emitting criteria. New Construction has three paths: Path 1 = >90% of paints/coatings, flooring, ceilings (1 pt); Path 2 = Path 1 plus >80% of any two of adhesives/sealants, walls, insulation, composite wood (2 pts); Path 3 = Path 1 plus >80% furniture (2 pts). Core and Shell earns 1 point for any three categories at >90%. Compliance is shown via third-party certification (e.g., CDPH Standard Method v1.2-2017 for VOC, ANSI/BIFMA for furniture, CARB/EPA TSCA Title VI ULEF/NAF for composite wood), qualified lab reports, or inherently non-emitting/salvaged products. Documented with the combined LEED materials calculator (shared with MRc4).

在覆盖的类别中指定并安装符合低释放标准的产品。新建含三条路径：路径1 = 涂料、地材、天花均>90%（1分）；路径2 = 路径1 再加粘合剂/密封剂、墙体、保温、复合木材中任两类>80%（2分）；路径3 = 路径1 加家具>80%（2分）。核心外壳任取三类>90%即得1分。合规可通过第三方认证（如 VOC 用 CDPH Standard Method v1.2-2017、家具用 ANSI/BIFMA、复合木材用 CARB/EPA TSCA Title VI 的 ULEF/NAF）、合格实验室报告，或本质不释放/回收材料证明。使用与 MRc4 共用的 LEED 材料计算器记录。

• Covered categories: paints/coatings, adhesives/sealants, flooring, walls, ceilings, insulation, furniture, composite wood — excluding MEP, concrete, and structural elements.
• VOC compliance uses CDPH Standard Method v1.2-2017 (private office scenario); furniture uses ANSI/BIFMA M7.1/e3; composite wood uses stringent ULEF/NAF criteria.
• Inherently non-emitting materials (stone, ceramic, powder-coated metal, untreated solid wood) need no emissions testing.
• Salvaged/reused materials over one year old automatically comply with VOC criteria.
• The credit shares the LEED materials calculator with MRc4, encouraging combined product vetting and documentation.

• 覆盖类别：涂料、粘合剂/密封剂、地材、墙体、天花、保温、家具、复合木材；不含机电、混凝土及结构构件。
• VOC 合规采用 CDPH Standard Method v1.2-2017（私人办公室场景）；家具用 ANSI/BIFMA M7.1/e3；复合木材采用严格的 ULEF/NAF 标准。
• 本质不释放材料（石材、陶瓷、粉末涂层金属、未处理实木）无需排放测试。
• 超过一年的回收/再利用材料自动满足 VOC 标准。
• 本项与 MRc4 共用 LEED 材料计算器，便于合并产品筛选与文档。

To encourage products with disclosed sustainability information and environmentally, economically, and socially preferable impacts, rewarding manufacturers that optimize products across multiple criteria areas.

鼓励选用已披露可持续信息、在环境经济与社会层面更优的产品，奖励在多个标准领域优化产品的制造商。

Select nonstructural products from nine categories (paints/coatings, adhesives/sealants, flooring, walls, ceilings, insulation, furniture, composite wood, plumbing fixtures) that demonstrate achievement in one or more of five criteria areas: climate health, human health, ecosystem health, social health and equity, and circular economy. Each product earns a Multi-Attribute Score (MAS) of up to 5 based on three achievement levels (Level 1 = 1×, Level 2 = 2×, Level 3 = 3× multiplier). Adjusted category value = sum of (product value × MAS) / total category value; any category exceeding 100% earns 1 point, up to 5 points for five categories. Verified via USGBC-approved third-party certifications, ecolabels, declarations, or standards (aligned with Mindful Materials CMF and AIA Materials Pledge).

从九类非结构产品（涂料、粘合剂/密封剂、地材、墙体、天花、保温、家具、复合木材、卫浴洁具）中选用，在五个标准领域之一取得成效：气候健康、人体健康、生态健康、社会健康与公平、循环经济。每个产品按三级成就（1级=1倍、2级=2倍、3级=3倍加权）获得最高5分的多属性得分（MAS）。类别调整后值 = Σ(产品值×MAS)/类别总值；任一类别超过100%即得1分，最多五类5分。通过 USGBC 认可的第三方认证、生态标签、声明或标准验证（与 Mindful Materials CMF 及 AIA 材料承诺对齐）。

• Rewards multi-attribute products across five criteria areas, aligning with Mindful Materials CMF and the AIA Materials Pledge.
• Three achievement levels (1×, 2×, 3×) let a single product document demonstrate multiple benefits and stack up to a MAS of 5.
• Nine product categories are scored; each category exceeding 100% adjusted value earns one point, max five categories.
• Climate health rewards disclosed/reduced embodied carbon and reuse; circular economy rewards recycled, bio-based, or take-back content.
• Shares the LEED materials calculator with MRc3 to harmonize selection, specification, and documentation.

• 奖励跨五个标准领域的多属性产品，与 Mindful Materials CMF 及 AIA 材料承诺对齐。
• 三级成就（1倍、2倍、3倍）使单一产品文档可叠加多项收益，最高 MAS 为5。
• 九类产品分别计分；调整后值超100%的类别各得1分，最多五类。
• 气候健康奖励已披露/降低的隐含碳与再利用；循环经济奖励回收、生物基或可回收内容。
• 与 MRc3 共用 LEED 材料计算器，统一选择、规格与文档。

To reduce C&D waste disposed in landfills and incinerators, cut the environmental and embodied-carbon impacts of new materials, avoid new landfill siting in frontline communities, and create green jobs and materials markets.

减少送往填埋与焚烧的施工拆除废弃物，降低新材料的环境与隐含碳影响，避免在前线社区新建填埋场，并创造绿色就业与材料市场。

Two components: (1) a C&D Materials Management Plan developed early (identifying haulers, facilities, and data/reporting); (2) Diversion with a final waste report. Points: 1 point for ≥50% diverted with ≥10% salvaged or source-separated to single-material recyclers; 2 points for ≥75% diverted with ≥25% salvaged/source-separated. Source-separated materials count 100% diverted; off-site salvaged materials are weighted 200%; mixed C&D at unverified facilities is capped at 35% diversion. Exclude hazardous waste, soil, land-clearing debris, on-site reuse (MRc1), and alternative daily cover. Core and Shell includes the plan in tenant guidelines.

两部分：(1) 尽早制定施工拆除材料管理计划（明确清运方、设施及数据/报告机制）；(2) 分流并提交最终废弃物报告。得分：分流≥50%且其中≥10%为回收或源头分类至单类回收者得1分；分流≥75%且其中≥25%为回收/源头分类得2分。源头分类材料计100%分流；离场回收材料加权200%；未经验证的混合拆除废料分流率上限35%。排除危险废物、土壤、场地清理碎料、现场再利用（MRc1）及替代日覆盖物。核心外壳须在租户指南中包含该计划。

• A C&D materials management plan must be developed during design, listing haulers, facilities, and tracking procedures.
• Off-site salvaged materials are weighted 2× (200%) versus other diverted materials to reward reuse over recycling.
• Source-separated streams are treated as 100% diverted; mixed C&D at unverified facilities is capped at 35% diversion.
• Hazardous waste, soil, land-clearing debris, and alternative daily cover are excluded from diversion totals.
• On-site reuse counts toward MRc1, while off-site salvage contributes here — the two credits are complementary.

• 施工拆除材料管理计划须在设计中制定，列明清运方、设施与追踪流程。
• 离场回收材料相较其他分流材料加权2倍（200%），以奖励再利用而非回收。
• 源头分类流按100%分流计；未验证的混合拆除废料分流率上限35%。
• 危险废物、土壤、场地清理碎料及替代日覆盖物不计入分流总量。
• 现场再利用计入 MRc1，离场回收计入本项，二者互补。

To protect the health and well-being of construction workers and future building occupants by minimizing the environmental-quality problems that construction and renovation activities can create.

通过减少施工与翻新活动可能引发的环境质量问题，保护建筑工人及未来使用者的健康与福祉。

Develop and implement construction management practices for the construction and preoccupancy phases covering: no smoking except in designated outdoor areas at least 25 ft (7.5 m) from the building; protection of workers from extreme heat; keeping contaminants out of the HVAC system (no permanent equipment use if possible, replace filters before occupancy, complete testing and balancing with new filters); source control for absorptive materials; pathway interruption to stop contaminated-air migration (isolation, walk-off mats, dust collectors); housekeeping with HEPA vacuums and wet/dust-control sweeping; and scheduling that sequences high-emission activities to reduce exposure. Practices are adapted from SMACNA IAQ Guidelines and OSHA heat-illness prevention.

在建造与入住前阶段制定并实施施工管理做法，须涵盖：除距离建筑至少 25 英尺（7.5 米）的指定室外吸烟区外全面禁烟；采取防暑措施保护工人；防止污染物进入 HVAC 系统（尽量不使用永久设备，入住前更换所有滤网并在新滤网到位后完成调试与平衡）；对吸湿性材料做源头管控；以隔离、除尘地垫、集尘装置等阻断污染空气扩散；使用 HEPA 吸尘器与抑尘清扫保持现场整洁；并通过工序安排减少高排放作业的暴露。做法参照 SMACNA 室内空气质量指南与 OSHA 防暑指引。

• No smoking on site except in designated areas at least 25 ft (7.5 m) from the building, with temporary signage displayed until completion.
• Protect workers from extreme heat via shaded rest areas, scheduled breaks, acclimatization, and training guided by the Human Impact Assessment.
• Safeguard HVAC by avoiding its use during construction, replacing all filters before occupancy, and completing testing/balancing with new filters.
• Control dust and contaminants through isolation, walk-off mats, dust guards on tools, and proper storage of absorptive materials off the floor.
• Use HEPA-filter vacuums and wet/dust-control sweeping for housekeeping, and sequence high-emission activities to limit cross-contamination.

• 工地全面禁烟，仅可在距建筑至少 25 英尺（7.5 米）的指定室外区域吸烟，并张贴临时标识至竣工。
• 通过遮荫休息区、作息安排、热适应训练保护工人防暑，培训须结合人类影响评估。
• 避免使用 HVAC 系统施工，入住前更换全部滤网，并在新滤网到位后完成测试与平衡。
• 以隔离、除尘地垫、工具集尘及吸湿材料离地存放来管控粉尘与污染物。
• 采用 HEPA 吸尘器与抑尘清扫，并错峰安排高排放作业以减少交叉污染。

To design for above-average indoor air quality that supports occupant health and well-being.

通过设计达到优于一般水平的室内空气质量，以支撑使用者的健康与福祉。

Three linked requirements: (1) investigate regional and local outdoor air quality per ASHRAE 62.1-2022 Sections 4.1-4.3, considering seasonal and climate-change variations; (2) meet ASHRAE 62.1-2022 Sections 5-6 via VRP, IAQP, or natural ventilation, with central HVAC serving regularly occupied spaces providing at least MERV 13 (or ePM1 50%, or in-room air cleaning per ASHRAE 241), plus outdoor-airflow measurement for systems >1,000 cfm, and healthcare/residential addenda; and (3) install permanent entryway systems at all primary exterior entrances (no length requirement). Healthcare follows ASHRAE 170-2021; residential dwelling units add mechanical ventilation, kitchen/bath exhaust, CO monitors, and combustion-safety provisions.

三项相互关联的要求：（1）按 ASHRAE 62.1-2022 第 4.1–4.3 节调查区域与地方室外空气质量，考量季节与气候变化；（2）通过 VRP、IAQP 或自然通风满足 ASHRAE 62.1-2022 第 5–6 节，向经常使用空间送风的中央 HVAC 至少达 MERV 13（或 ePM1 50%，或符合 ASHRAE 241 的室内空气净化），且对风量大于 1000 cfm 的系统设室外风量监测，并遵循医疗与住宅补充规定；（3）在所有主要室外入口设置永久性入口除尘系统（无长度要求）。医疗项目遵循 ASHRAE 170-2021；住宅单元另需机械通风、厨卫排风、一氧化碳报警器及燃烧安全条款。

• Investigate outdoor air quality locally and regionally, including seasonal pollen, wildfire PM2.5, and ozone patterns, informed by the Climate Resilience Assessment.
• Provide at least MERV 13 / ePM1 50% filtration (or compliant in-room air cleaning) on central HVAC serving regularly occupied spaces; airflow monitoring required above 1,000 cfm.
• Meet ASHRAE 62.1-2022 via VRP, IAQP, or natural ventilation; IAQP adds post-completion testing and occupant survey.
• Install permanent entryway systems (grates, grilles, slotted, or rollout mats) at all primary exterior entrances to capture dirt and particulates.
• Residential and healthcare projects have additional ventilation, exhaust, CO-monitoring, and combustion-appliance safety requirements.

• 调查地方与区域室外空气质量，包括季节性花粉、野火 PM2.5 与臭氧，并参考气候韧性评估。
• 向经常使用空间送风的中央 HVAC 提供至少 MERV 13 / ePM1 50% 过滤（或合规室内净化）；风量超 1000 cfm 须设室外风量监测。
• 通过 VRP、IAQP 或自然通风满足 ASHRAE 62.1-2022；采用 IAQP 需竣工后做检测与使用者调查。
• 在所有主要室外入口设置永久性入口除尘系统（格栅、槽式或卷垫）以拦截尘土。
• 住宅与医疗项目另有通风、排风、一氧化碳报警及燃烧器具安全等附加要求。

To minimize occupant and community exposure to tobacco smoke, tobacco-substitute or cannabis smoke, and vehicle exhaust emissions.

尽量减少使用者与周边社区接触烟草烟雾、烟草替代品或大麻烟雾以及机动车尾气排放。

Prohibit indoor smoking entirely (with limited exceptions) and prohibit outdoor smoking except in designated areas at least 25 ft (7.5 m) or to the maximum allowed by local code from entries, outdoor-air intakes, and operable windows; schools must prohibit all on-site smoking. Prohibit vehicle idling on-site. Communicate both policies to occupants with enforcement provisions or prohibitive signage. Residential projects must meet the above except in dwelling units and private balconies; where smoking is permitted, each unit must pass a blower-door compartmentalization test (ANSI/RESNET/ICC 380) within leakage caps. Cultural ceremonial practices (e.g., smudging) are exempt.

室内全面禁烟（有限例外除外），室外除距入口、新风进风口和可开启窗至少 25 英尺（7.5 米）或地方规范允许最大距离的指定区域外禁止吸烟；学校须全场地禁烟。禁止在场内机动车怠速。向使用者传达两项政策并落实执行或禁示标识。住宅项目除单元内与私人阳台外须满足上述要求；若允许吸烟，每单元须通过鼓风门分隔测试（ANSI/RESNET/ICC 380）并符合漏风上限。文化礼仪性焚烧（如熏香）豁免。

• Indoor smoking is always prohibited; outdoor smoking only in designated areas at least 25 ft (7.5 m) from openings and air intakes.
• Schools must ban all on-site smoking, with signage posted at the property line.
• Vehicle idling is prohibited on-site to reduce exhaust entering the building and the neighboring community.
• Policies must be communicated and enforced via signage or management provisions; exceptions may apply for operational needs.
• Residential units permitting smoking must pass blower-door compartmentalization leakage tests; indigenous ceremonial practices are exempt.

• 室内始终禁烟；室外仅可在距开口与进风口至少 25 英尺（7.5 米）的指定区域吸烟。
• 学校须全场地禁烟，并在用地边界设置标识。
• 禁止场内机动车怠速，以减少尾气进入建筑及邻近社区。
• 政策须通过标识或管理规定传达并执行；特定作业需求可设例外。
• 允许吸烟的住宅单元须通过鼓风门分隔漏风测试；原住民礼仪性焚烧豁免。

To design for increased indoor air quality that better protects occupant health.

通过提升室内空气质量设计以更好地保护使用者健康。

Choose one of two options (1 point each): Option 1 Increased Ventilation raises breathing-zone outdoor air rates at least 15% above EQp2 minimums (30% for exemplary performance) in 95% of regularly occupied spaces. Option 2 Enhanced IAQ Design applies stricter LEED design limits for PM2.5 (10 µg/m3), formaldehyde (20 µg/m3), and ozone (10 ppb) beyond ASHRAE 62.1 Tables 6-5/6-6. Both options draw on ASHRAE Guideline 42-2023; air-cleaning systems may be used with verified safety/effectiveness per EQp2.

二选一（各 1 分）：选项 1“提高通风量”将呼吸区室外新风量在 EQp2 最低值基础上至少提高 15%（达 30% 可获示范性能），覆盖 95% 经常使用空间。选项 2“增强 IAQ 设计”在 ASHRAE 62.1 表 6-5/6-6 之外采用更严格的 LEED 设计限值：PM2.5（10 µg/m3）、甲醛（20 µg/m3）、臭氧（10 ppb）。两项均参照 ASHRAE 指南 42-2023；可采用空气净化系统，但须符合 EQp2 的经核实安全与有效性要求。

• Option 1 boosts outdoor airflow at least 15% (or 30% for exemplary) above minimums in 95% of regularly occupied spaces.
• Option 2 tightens design limits to PM2.5 10 µg/m3, formaldehyde 20 µg/m3, and ozone 10 ppb.
• Targets are based on WHO, NIOSH, and ASHRAE Emerging Issue guidance for low, health-protective concentrations.
• Increased ventilation can improve cognitive performance, reduce absenteeism, and aid sleep quality.
• Air-cleaning systems may help meet targets if safety-tested and effectiveness-verified per EQp2.

• 选项 1 将室外新风量在最低值之上提高至少 15%（达 30% 为示范性能），覆盖 95% 经常使用空间。
• 选项 2 将设计限值收紧至 PM2.5 10 µg/m3、甲醛 20 µg/m3、臭氧 10 ppb。
• 目标值依据 WHO、NIOSH 与 ASHRAE 新兴议题指引，取低而具健康保护力的浓度。
• 提高通风可改善认知表现、降低缺勤率并提升睡眠质量。
• 空气净化系统若通过安全测试且有效性经核实（按 EQp2），可用于达成目标。

To move beyond neutral spaces toward human-centered design that supports customization, enjoyment, and emotional connection between people and the building, increasing satisfaction and stewardship.

超越中性空间，迈向以人为中心的设计，支持个性化、愉悦感及人与建筑的情感联结，从而提升满意度与守护意识。

New Construction earns 1-7 points by combining options: Option 1 Biophilic Environment (Integrated Biophilic Design 1 pt; Quality Views 2-3 pts for 75%/90% of regularly occupied area); Option 2 Adaptable Environment (1 pt, with required accessible quiet space); Option 3 Thermal Environment (1 pt, per ASHRAE 55-2023); Option 4 Sound Environment (1 pt mapping, 2 pts acoustic criteria for 75% of occupied spaces and all classrooms); Option 5 Lighting Environment (Solar Glare 1 pt; Quality Electric Lighting 1 pt; Proximity to Windows 1 pt; Daylight Simulation 1-4 pts). Core and Shell uses Option 1 (adds Outdoor Connections 1 pt) and Option 2 Lighting only. All strategies should foster enjoyment and memorability.

新建项目通过组合选项获 1–7 分：选项 1 亲生物环境（整合亲生物设计 1 分；优质视野 2–3 分，覆盖经常使用面积 75%/90%）；选项 2 适应型环境（1 分，须含可达安静空间）；选项 3 热环境（1 分，按 ASHRAE 55-2023）；选项 4 声环境（制图 1 分；声学标准 2 分，覆盖 75% 使用空间及全部教室）；选项 5 光环境（遮阳 1 分、优质电照 1 分、近窗采光 1 分、日光模拟 1–4 分）。核心与外壳项目仅用选项 1（增“户外联结”1 分）与选项 2 光环境。各项策略应促进愉悦与难忘体验。

• Biophilic design follows five Kellert-Calabrese principles; Quality Views require glazing >40% VLT for 75-90% of regularly occupied area.
• Adaptable Environment offers sensory choice/flexibility across thermal, sound, and lighting plus a required accessible quiet space for neurodivergent users.
• Thermal Environment aligns with ASHRAE 55-2023, addressing seasonal adjustment and transition-space acclimatization to avoid overcooling.
• Sound Environment maps acoustic expectations then demonstrates criteria for 75% of occupied spaces and all classrooms/core learning spaces.
• Lighting Environment covers glare control, color rendering (CRI 90 or TM-30 Rf 78/Rg 95), window proximity, and daylight autonomy (sDA) simulation worth up to 4 points.

• 亲生物设计遵循 Kellert-Calabrese 五项原则；优质视野要求玻璃可见光透射率 >40%，覆盖 75%–90% 经常使用面积。
• 适应型环境在热、声、光三方面提供感官选择与弹性，并须设可达安静空间以照护神经多样性人群。
• 热环境遵循 ASHRAE 55-2023，关注季节性调节与过渡空间适应，避免过冷。
• 声环境先绘制声学期望图，再对 75% 使用空间及全部教室/核心学习空间落实声学标准。
• 光环境涵盖眩光控制、色彩还原（CRI 90 或 TM-30 Rf 78/Rg 95）、近窗采光及日光自主（sDA）模拟，最高 4 分。

To support the diverse needs of occupants and broaden the usability of the building, fostering both individual and collective belonging.

支持使用者的多元需求并扩大建筑的可使用性，培育个体与集体的归属感。

First comply with all locally applicable accessibility codes identified in the Human Impact Assessment (or three foundational elements if none exist: ramps, 32-inch door clear width, front-approach wheelchair-accessible counters). Then include at least 10 strategies from four categories that go beyond code: physical diversity (e.g., wave-to-open doors, mobility-device seating for 10% of occupants, inclusive fitness equipment, alternate accessible routes); safety and aging (nonslip flooring, glazing markers, audible/visual emergency alerts, closed stair risers, visual contrast, floor-level warnings); social health (lactation rooms, all-gender restrooms, adult changing tables, multilingual signage, biophilic support for neurodivergent users); and navigation (wayfinding signage, symbols, braille/cues, color blocking, haptic maps). Up to three alternative strategies may substitute.

首先遵守人类影响评估中确认的所有地方无障碍规范（若无规范，则满足三项基础要素：坡道、32 英寸门净宽、正面接近的无障碍柜台）。再从四类超越规范的策略中至少选用 10 项：身体多样性（如挥手开门、10% 座位容移动辅助器具、包容性健身设备、替代无障碍路线）；安全与适老（防滑地面、玻璃标识、视听应急报警、封闭楼梯踏步、视觉对比、地面高差警示）；社会健康（哺乳室、全性别卫生间、成人更衣台、多语言标识、以亲生物设计支持神经多样性人群）；以及导航（导向标识、符号、盲文/提示、色彩分区、触觉地图）。可用至多三项替代策略替代。

• Comply with local accessibility codes (or three foundational elements where no code exists) as the baseline.
• Select at least 10 strategies beyond code across physical diversity, safety/aging, social health, and navigation.
• Social-health strategies include lactation spaces, all-gender restrooms, adult changing tables, and multilingual signage.
• Neurodivergent inclusion is supported by also achieving EQc2 biophilic design (Integrated Biophilic Design path).
• Up to three alternative inclusive-design strategies may be submitted if fewer than 10 listed strategies are relevant.

• 以遵守地方无障碍规范（无规范时三项基础要素）为基线。
• 在身体多样性、安全与适老、社会健康、导航四类中选择至少 10 项超越规范的策略。
• 社会健康策略含哺乳空间、全性别卫生间、成人更衣台与多语言标识。
• 以同时达成 EQc2 亲生物设计（整合路径）来支持神经多样性人群。
• 若相关列表策略不足 10 项，可提交至多三项替代性包容设计策略。

To support design features that increase occupants' capacity to adapt to changing climate conditions and protect them from events that compromise indoor environmental quality and health.

支持能提升使用者适应气候条件变化、并在损害室内环境质量与健康的事件中提供保护的设计。

Select any two options/paths for up to 2 points: Option 1 (New Construction only) designs an episodic outdoor-event management mode per ASHRAE Guideline 44 (e.g., wildfire smoke) documented and commissioned; Option 2 (New Construction only) designs an Infection Risk Management Mode meeting ASHRAE 241-2023 minimum equivalent clean airflow rates, documented and commissioned; Option 3 designs passive thermal safety during power outages - Path 1 extreme heat or Path 2 extreme cold (2-day TMY peak, designate thermal safety zones with natural ventilation, density <=1 person/20 sq ft); Option 4 provides operable windows for 50% (1 pt) or 75% (2 pts) of regularly occupied spaces per ASHRAE 62.1-2022 Section 6.4. Leverage IPp1 Climate Resilience and IPp2 Human Impact findings.

任选两项/路径，最高 2 分：选项 1（仅新建）按 ASHRAE 指南 44 设计突发室外事件管理模式（如野火烟霾），并纳入文档与调试；选项 2（仅新建）设计满足 ASHRAE 241-2023 最低等效洁净风量的感染风险管理模式，并纳入文档与调试；选项 3 设计断电时的被动热安全——路径 1 极端高温或路径 2 极端低温（典型气象年峰值持续 2 天，划定具自然通风的热安全区，密度 ≤1 人/20 平方英尺）；选项 4 为 50%（1 分）或 75%（2 分）经常使用空间提供可按 ASHRAE 62.1-2022 第 6.4 节开启的窗。应参考 IPp1 气候韧性与 IPp2 人类影响评估结论。

• Option 1 (NC only) creates a smoke/event management mode per ASHRAE Guideline 44, verified in commissioning.
• Option 2 (NC only) creates an Infection Risk Management Mode meeting ASHRAE 241-2023 equivalent clean airflow rates.
• Option 3 passively maintains thermally habitable conditions for a 2-day outage (extreme heat or cold) with designated, naturally ventilated safety zones.
• Option 4 provides operable windows for 50% (1 pt) or 75% (2 pts) of regularly occupied floor area per ASHRAE 62.1.
• Select options using IPp1 Climate Resilience and IPp2 Human Impact Assessments; multiple simultaneous events may be considered.

• 选项 1（仅新建）依 ASHRAE 指南 44 建立烟霾/事件管理模式，并于调试中验证。
• 选项 2（仅新建）建立满足 ASHRAE 241-2023 等效洁净风量的感染风险管理模式。
• 选项 3 在断电 2 天内（极端高温或低温）被动维持可居住热条件，并划定具自然通风的安全区。
• 选项 4 为 50%（1 分）或 75%（2 分）经常使用面积提供可开启窗，符合 ASHRAE 62.1。
• 应据 IPp1 气候韧性与 IPp2 人类影响评估选择选项，并可考虑多事件并发。

To support better management of indoor air quality and reveal opportunities for health-based approaches to building operations.

更好地管理室内空气质量，并为以健康为导向的运营方式提供改进机会。

Option 1 Preoccupancy Air Testing (1-2 pts): after construction, under normal ventilation, test representative locations per floor-area Table 1. Path 1 tests PM and inorganic gases (CO, PM2.5/PM10, ozone) to limits in Table 2 (1 pt). Path 2 screens TVOC and tests individual VOCs in Table 3 to limits, lab-accredited per ISO/IEC 17025 (1 pt). Retail may test within 14 days of occupancy. Option 2 Continuous Indoor Air Monitoring (1 pt): install building-grade monitors (CO2, PM2.5, TVOC, temperature, humidity) at 3-6 ft height, at least one per 25,000 sq ft, reporting hourly per RESET Grade B/UL 2905. Both options may be used for 2 points.

选项 1 入住前空气检测（1–2 分）：施工后于正常通风条件下，按面积表 1 在代表性位置检测。路径 1 检测颗粒物与无机气体（CO、PM2.5/PM10、臭氧）并满足表 2 限值（1 分）。路径 2 筛查 TVOC 并检测表 3 中单项 VOC 限值，实验室须按 ISO/IEC 17025 认可（1 分）。零售项目可在入住后 14 天内检测。选项 2 连续室内空气监测（1 分）：安装建筑级监测器（CO2、PM2.5、TVOC、温度、湿度），高度 3–6 英尺，每 25000 平方英尺至少一台，按 RESET B 级/UL 2905 每小时上报。两选项可并用得 2 分。

• Preoccupancy testing occurs after substantial completion, under normal ventilation, before occupancy (retail within 14 days).
• Path 1 tests CO, PM2.5/PM10, and ozone against Table 2 limits; nonattainment areas allow higher PM2.5 limits.
• Path 2 screens TVOC and tests 13 individual VOCs (e.g., formaldehyde 20 µg/m3) via accredited labs per ISO/IEC 17025.
• Continuous monitoring uses building-grade sensors for CO2, PM2.5, TVOC, temperature, humidity at 3-6 ft, hourly reporting.
• Monitor density starts at one per 25,000 sq ft, with best practice of one per 5,000 sq ft; place away from sources/sinks.

• 入住前检测于基本竣工、正常通风、入住前完成（零售可在入住后 14 天内）。
• 路径 1 检测 CO、PM2.5/PM10 与臭氧，对照表 2 限值；未达标区 PM2.5 限值放宽。
• 路径 2 筛查 TVOC 并检测 13 种单项 VOC（如甲醛 20 µg/m3），由 ISO/IEC 17025 认可实验室执行。
• 连续监测采用建筑级传感器测 CO2、PM2.5、TVOC、温度、湿度，高 3–6 英尺，每小时上报。
• 监测密度为每 25000 平方英尺至少一台，最佳实践每 5000 平方英尺一台；应远离污染源与汇。

To encourage projects to achieve credits that respond to geographically or context-specific environmental, social-equity, and public-health concerns, and to spur teams to experiment with and advance new sustainable building approaches.

鼓励项目取得能够应对特定地理或背景下的环境、社会公平与公共卫生议题的得分点，并推动团队试验与推进全新的可持续建筑方法。

Earn up to 9 points through any combination of five pathways drawn from USGBC's Project Priority Library or project-specific innovation: (1) Regional Priority—credits flagged as especially important for the project's region; (2) Project-Type Credits—credits addressing the unique needs of a particular building type or adaptation; (3) Exemplary Performance—going beyond an existing LEED v5 prerequisite or credit in areas such as decarbonization, resilience, health, equity, or ecosystems; (4) Pilot Credits—experimental credits under evaluation for future inclusion; (5) Innovation Strategies—measurable environmental gains from an approach not covered elsewhere in LEED v5, documented with intent, compliance requirements, submittals, and design approach.

通过以下五类路径的任意组合最多获得 9 分（均来自 USGBC 的 Project Priority Library 或项目自定创新）：(1) 区域优先——被标注为对项目所在地区尤为重要的得分点；(2) 项目类型得分点——针对特定建筑类型或应用场景独特需求的得分点；(3) 卓越表现——在脱碳、韧性、健康、公平或生态系统等方面超出既有 LEED v5 先决条件或得分点要求；(4) 试点得分点——正在评估、未来可能纳入体系的实验性得分点；(5) 创新策略——采用 LEED v5 中未涵盖的方法取得可衡量的环境效益，须提交意图、合规要求、证明资料及设计方法说明。

• The category is adaptive: new credits can be added between rating-system versions, so LEED stays current with emerging technology.
• Points are flexible—teams may concentrate on one priority (e.g., coastal flood resilience) or spread effort across several pathways.
• Regional Priority credits target geographically specific environmental, social-equity, or public-health concerns.
• Exemplary Performance rewards exceeding thresholds of existing credits in priority areas like decarbonization, resilience, health, equity, and ecosystems.
• Innovation Strategies require documentation of intent, compliance criteria, submittals, and design approach for an otherwise-uncovered strategy.

• 该类别具有适应性：可在版本之间新增得分点，使 LEED 紧跟新兴技术。
• 得分灵活——团队可聚焦于单一优先事项（如沿海防洪韧性），也可在多条路径间分散投入。
• 区域优先得分点针对特定地理区域的环境、社会公平或公共卫生议题。
• 卓越表现奖励在脱碳、韧性、健康、公平、生态系统等优先领域超出既有得分点门槛。
• 创新策略须就 LEED 未涵盖的方法提交意图、合规标准、证明资料与设计方法说明。

To encourage integrated project teams by having a LEED AP involved, and to make the certification application and review process more efficient.

通过让 LEED AP 参与项目来推动团队整合，并使认证申请与审核流程更高效。

At least one principal project-team participant must hold an active LEED AP credential with a specialty suited to the project—specifically the BD+C (Building Design and Construction) specialty for New Construction or Core and Shell projects. A LEED AP without a specialty does not qualify. Documentation requires identifying the credentialed individual and confirming the BD+C specialty plus an up-to-date GBCI Credential Certificate on the AP's GBCI profile at review time.

至少一名项目团队核心成员须持有有效的、适合项目专业的 LEED AP 资质——对于新建或核心与外壳项目，须为 BD+C（Building Design and Construction）专业。无专业的 LEED AP 不符合条件。证明资料需注明该持证人员，并确认其 BD+C 专业以及在审核时于 AP 的 GBCI 档案中上传了有效的 GBCI 资质证书。

• Worth 1 point for both New Construction and Core and Shell.
• Requires a LEED AP with the BD+C specialty on the core design team—not just any LEED AP.
• The credential must be active (GBCI Certificate current) at the time of certification review.
• Aligns with all three LEED v5 impact areas: decarbonization, quality of life, and ecological conservation.
• Recognizes the value of integrated, knowledgeable team leadership in streamlining certification.

• 在新建与核心与外壳项目中均值 1 分。
• 要求核心设计团队中有具 BD+C 专业的 LEED AP，而非任意 LEED AP。
• 资质须在认证审核时有效（GBCI 证书在有效期内）。
• 对应 LEED v5 全部三大影响领域：脱碳、生活质量与生态保护。
• 认可具备综合知识与领导力的团队对简化认证流程的价值。